673
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Anamana@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

People use discord in the browser? Damn boi

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago

Never use an app for what should be a web site.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It works better for me as an app. I don't like my browsers to be cluttered like that. But if it fits your usecase

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

That's why I like Chrome's (and various Chromium browsers') ability to app-ify sites. Will create a .app in MacOS, .desktop in Linux, etc. Launches as what looks like an independent app with its own dock/launcher icon. Utilizes most of their PWA stuff.

Sadly, it looks like Chrome has hidden the option completely in the latest version unless you set a flag that will probably go away in a few releases. Edge makes it pretty clear.

I wish Firefox would bring the feature back. They deprecated it years ago and I use it heavily (only reason/time I use Chromium stuff on most of my machines)

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know it from Android and I was using it quite frequently as well. But in my opinion it's better as a website alternative, compared to being a complete replacement for apps. Things are less buggy and more smooth for me that way.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I fail to understand how opening a web site, which is all a browser does, can be defined as 'cluttered', but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

It's inconvenient and disorganized to have it as an extra tab (taking up tab space) or browser window (same symbols), also it runs smoother for me within the app.

but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files

I care about UX & seems like I'm not the only one at that. If I would care about privacy and security I wouldn't use discord, but matrix or sth.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

As long as you don't care about security, no problems.

[-] cmrss2@aussie.zone 28 points 1 year ago

At least you can block some of the telemetry with uBlock or similar

[-] etrotta@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Why would you want to block their telemetry?
It is not like they're using it to serve ads to you, and it should be better for everyone for developers to make decisions based on how users are actually using their app, no?

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

It's simple. Nothing that happens on my device is their data.

Any telemetry that isn't explicitly opt in with zero consequence for not doing so should be the kind of illegal that gets every asset your company owns seized immediately for non-compliance. All user data collection is spyware.

[-] ominouslemon@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Invasions of privacy are bad per se, even if you don't use them to serve ads

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

"even if you don’t use them to serve ads", Which they do, just indirectly.

[-] cmrss2@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

The desktop client logs and sends lists of currently running processes by default, and they also collect usage data (which channels you open, how long for, who you’re interacting with). In the settings, there’s literally an option for “Use data to customize my Discord experience”. And sure, they don’t show ads, but their third-party integrations do. Article with sources

In the end, processing and storing millions of texts, images, videos and files permanently, and hosting all those live voice and video calls, and making updates to the clients, will always cost more than what they get from Nitro and server boosting. Discord isn’t profitable; they have to make the deficit up to shareholders somehow.

[-] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

The problem is one of trust; there is none.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Fair, but from a UX and technical perspective it's a pain in the ass to use it like that

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

At my old workplace I used it in the browser daily. Wasn’t really an issue at all.

[-] MakeItCount@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yes as I manly use it on phone

So for the once on a blue moon when I'll open discord on my PC, the browser is enough

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Durotar@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Discord is a web app, there's no other way. You either use your main browser or the one they're bundling it with.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it's just a WebApp, then why does one of the commenters have issues to run it without the browser?

See: https://feddit.de/comment/2192027

Edit: And I know that you're right technically, still there is a difference in how you run it when using a browser vs Webapp.

[-] Durotar@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Theoretically, it may have additional features when it's bundled with Electron, but ultimately there's nothing wrong with running it in the browser.

[-] Anamana@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah I know there's nothing wrong with it. I was just surprised so many people do it. But I guess we have a privacy-aware tech bubble here

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
673 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60305 readers
2396 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS