121
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 2 weeks ago

It literally says diplomacy is preferable but all options are on the table.

Am I nuts or is that a reasonable, balanced position?

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

All options are on table is not reasonsble especially when irsn never seeked a nuclear weapon

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

This is not a reasonable, balanced position.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's relative. It's not exactly a reasonable, balanced position, but it's more reasonable than the alternative which is clear and unambiguous war crimes, and possibly meets the criteria for genocide.

We knew what Trump's policy was on the campaign trail:

On Iran, Project 2025 advocates a markedly more confrontational stance, denigrating diplomacy and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in favor of barely veiled advocacy for regime change.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
121 points (100.0% liked)

Inventing Reality

575 readers
278 users here now

When the media decides who you are rooting for.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS