121
War Hawk becomes Peace Hawk (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 month ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago

It literally says diplomacy is preferable but all options are on the table.

Am I nuts or is that a reasonable, balanced position?

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

All options are on table is not reasonsble especially when irsn never seeked a nuclear weapon

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

This is not a reasonable, balanced position.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's relative. It's not exactly a reasonable, balanced position, but it's more reasonable than the alternative which is clear and unambiguous war crimes, and possibly meets the criteria for genocide.

We knew what Trump's policy was on the campaign trail:

On Iran, Project 2025 advocates a markedly more confrontational stance, denigrating diplomacy and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in favor of barely veiled advocacy for regime change.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
121 points (100.0% liked)

Inventing Reality

618 readers
50 users here now

When the media decides who you are rooting for.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml