1775
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rayuza@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago

All we need now is a headphone jack

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago

We need SD cards more. They removed them so they can charge you 300 $ to upgrade 128gb and to force you into shitty cloud service.

Again, just anti consumer bullshit spearheaded by Apple and gargled by Samsung.

[-] el_bhm@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

I have flashbacks to using external storage on Android. It was such a shit show of an API. That being said, external storage, to break away from cloud storage is the next needed thing. We need to own the data.

[-] beigegull@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

When you design an OS to pretend there's no such thing as a file, it ends up being bad at handling files.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, even today, browsing through files on Android is a fucking mess. And there isn't an SD card.

So the SD card wasn't the problem

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I was trying to figure out recently how do I copy files into application user data directory, it turns out you just can't, lol.

[-] bric@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You can with very basic root tools, but really that just solidifies your point. It's an easy thing to do, but they've intentionally taken away the ability for no good reason

[-] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's perfectly fine on Sony Xperia.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mobile Linux seems to carry it really good

[-] chaircat@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago

Again, just anti consumer bullshit spearheaded by Apple and gargled by Samsung.

Samsung was actually one of the later Android manufacturers to drop it is my recollection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KCN@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago

Definitely. Never understood why some manufacturers removed jacks

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

I personally prefer my bluetooth headphones, but it's not like bluetooth and jacks can't exist on the same device..

Plus, pairing bluetooth in a car can be annoying as fuck. Looking at you, Nissan

[-] Mdotaut801@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I feel like BT pairing and functionality in cars has always been shit. I have issues in my 2020 Ford, had issues in my 2015 and 2018 bmws, and my gf has issues in her Toyota.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

BT pairing in our Ram works fine, and it works fine with the aftermarket Pioneer radio in my car. I've never had a major issue with either one with any phone I've owned, iPhone or Android.

For our Mazda, though, BT pairing does not work reliably with my Samsung S21 - it's okay for phone calls (in fact, the car "steals" my calls if I'm on the phone at home and my wife gets home with the car), but for music it almost never works correctly, unless I'm also using Android Auto, which is rare because I just don't need it for most day-to-day drives. The BT phone and music works fine for my wife's iPhone, though.

I blame the car - my phone works just fine with several sets of Bluetooth headsets, and the other two car stereos. I think Mazda just didn't bother to do any debugging before they shipped that piece of shit to the dealers. (This theory is based on other bugs we've found in the infotainment system as well.)

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Because they do the bare minimum to meet the spec so that they could advertise it then. They still do the bare minimum now.

[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I want a headphone jack, but the truth is that I can't remember the last time I used mine. I have an old phone plugged into an old amp that I can play Spotify through, otherwise I use bt.

[-] KCN@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they could coexist. I'm partial to non-bluetooth, but only because they come in shapes that I find more comfortable, and I've yet to find bluetooth ones that don't make my ears hurt

[-] Mdotaut801@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You know there’s ways you can change that, right? There’s different sizes you can get for the piece that goes in your ear and they often come with the headphones/ear buds.

[-] KCN@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I just haven't found any that I found comfortable with yet

[-] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Money from selling true wireless earbuds was too enticing. Even Fairphone made them and removed headphone jack and spat nonsense that it was a "point of failure."

[-] Psiczar@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Headphone jacks are a 19th century invention, if having them restricts innovation then I am all for removing them.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 20 points 1 year ago

We can't only consider innovation today, we also have to consider its ecological impact. Jack plugs and headphones are way more durable than Bluetooth equivalent. I have 16 yo jack headset that still works perfectly, I only had to change the cushions twice.

[-] brb@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

It's specifically the wire that always breaks first. How can they be more durable?

[-] ne0phyte@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can repair a broken cable fairly easily.

When you buy wireless headphones you know upfront that they will die within a few years and you will not be able to replace the tiny glued in, oddly shaped batteries they come with.

I like the convenience of BT at times, but I really miss having headphone jacks and hate having to bring adaptors with me.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you can financially, buy (second-hand) higher-end material, it will come with stronger wires and stronger connections.
For example, see the difference in the constraints damper on these connectors:

vs Apple's:

Jack being simple technology, it's also very easy to get it repaired by the nearby tech enthusiast armed with a soldering iron.

[-] timo_timboo_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

To add to that, many IEMs (and many other headphones too probably) come with removable cables.

[-] Psiczar@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

So stop making any technological advancement because of the potential impact of e-waste? Not saying it’s a bad thing but it will have have its own environmental implications. No new energy development, we have to rely on existing oil and nuclear technology rather than investing in making renewable energy sources cheaper and more efficient.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not an either-or situation, we can do both at the same time, we just have to consider environmental impact as an essential component of innovation.

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

At the point we are at, yes we have to make a major change, e-waste is an immense problem for many years and we are only starting to fight it.

Inventions not thinking about e-waste at all shouldn't be allowed anymore.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 6 points 1 year ago

So are speakers and batteries.

[-] Psiczar@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

True, but we don’t have any practical alternatives for them.

[-] PeachMan@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago

What's the practical alternative to headphone jacks? Bluetooth is crap and carrying around extra dongles is annoying.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

Bluetooth headphones are more practical due to not having wires. Jack is better for latency.

[-] PeachMan@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Practical for some scenarios, but impractical in others. A headphone jack also offers better sound quality overall and a less flaky connection, with no audio cutouts. It's not just latency, it's a superior and more reliable way to transmit high quality audio. And there's no battery to worry about charging. And a standard set of wired headphones can last for DECADES while a Bluetooth headset will start to die in about five years or less because the battery is non-replaceable lithium-ion. And there's no concern about whether your wired headphones are optimized for Android or iPhone, it's a standardized connector with an identical experience on both. And there's no issue with wireless interference on the 2.4GHz band that Bluetooth operates on.

I can come up with more if you want.

[-] KCN@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

Technically 20th century, if I'm not mistaken? I just don't see how they would restrict innovation, I guess

[-] Psiczar@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Apparently it’s based on a plug invented in 1878, according to the BBC.

[-] KCN@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting! It's cool to know how stuff we use/used was developed

[-] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

By that logic let's just replace the most superior household plug. The 3 pin UK plug.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A "19th century" technology that objectively produces better sound quality and uses less energy. And I already have wired earbuds and headsets.

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unless there's an alternative, no it's not restricting innovation.

[-] samsy@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The argument was saving space for other parts. That's true in a way. But if things needed we should have this space. What's next? Saving the space of the charger? /s

[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'd be almost ready to say that we don't need them any more if Bluetooth headphones were about 100x better and cheaper

[-] T156@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

At the same time, wired earphones/headphones are already just as good with a lot less parts/complexity.

You don't need batteries, radios, and chips for coding/decoding a signal coming out of a headphone jack. You can just plumb it straight into the speakers. No need to mess with controls and all of that, which would make them a lot cheaper.

[-] beatensoup@baraza.africa 2 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget how new Bluetooth headphones require that you download an app to set up the headphone. So a whole new data harvesting broker forces itself right where an audiojack used to be.

Check on the AppStore’s the kind of personal data one has to handover to tune the headphones. Total fuckery!

[-] briongloid@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Bluetooth 5+ definitely made wired headphones obsolete for me.

[-] zik@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

But now you have to charge two things rather than one. Some people would prefer not to have to do that.

[-] cjthomp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Still too much lag. I love my QC45s, but there's still just enough lag to bother me

[-] raptir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Bluetooth headphones are solid now, as long as you have something that supports aptx HD and LL (HD for music, LL for movies/games). But yeah they're not cheap.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
1775 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58199 readers
2835 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS