794
Someone's cutting onions
(reddthat.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
794 points (100.0% liked)
memes
20844 readers
1465 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Indeed, no scientific studies could ever benefit from a 40% increase in data from test subjects.
Not to mention they aren't even in the same environmental conditions, or doing the same activities, the data would be completely different (aside from the common baseline of space stuff) and therefore useless for comparison purposes.
I'm not sure why anyone would bother.
Look, i get why you might think it's unnecessary, i don't care enough to have an my own opinion on it's cost/benefit analysis.
All i was saying is that reasons do exist.
You could get 40% more of the same data by increasing output on the ISS with no increased risk of death. The difference in environment between the ISS and the moon is worthless, instead of zero gravity they're just in low gravity, which we can achieve without even going to the ISS, low orbit would do the trick with even lower risk. This is a publicity stunt to compensate for the US looking like a fucking joke, extra risk for no extra benefit beyond showing off.
All of what you said is reasonable at a glance, still it's not relevant to my argument.
Reasons exist.
Whether or not the reasons are good is irrelevant to my original argument.
If you're asking me whether or not i think the reasons are good, my answer is i don't know and I’m not invested enough in the answer to go looking.
What i will do is put down my uneducated answers to your response.
Increasing output of existing members is unlikely to be equivalent to data from entirely new test subjects.
40% more data on existing subjects isn't the same as 40% additional data from new subjects.
For a more equal comparison you'd need to ship new people to the ISS and then your argument would only be true if there was zero risk of death in getting new people to the ISS.
That's subjective but you could be right, i'd possibly argue that the combination of factors in space in addition to the low gravity would be different than a terrestrial equivalent, so a low gravity experiment in the ISS might be a better comparison.
I don't know enough to be certain about any of that though.
Possibly, i'd guess likely, but again i don't know enough to have a reasonable opinion on this.
You can put new people on the ISS, fucking duh, and it's still much lower risk than a moon mission. Not zero risk, just significantly lower risk for the same results, as I already said.
The difference between zero and low gravity is not subjective.
"Justifications exist for this course of action even if they're stupid" is a bad argument to make and you should stop making it, if you know you're not qualified to evaluate the validity of those justifications then quit trying
If you'll go back and read what i said i was responding directly to the quote :
Agreed, It's a good job that isn't what i was claiming then, "The difference in environment between the ISS and the moon is worthless" is subjective.
Not what i said originally , it's in the chat history, please try harder.
I'll put down the sentence you wrote, and my response to it.
response
The follow up :
Doesn't imply the reasons are bad, just that they are irrelevant.
If you think qualifications are required for statements clearly stated as opinions then feel free to provide yours.
Also, not what i said, you should really read the comments properly before responding to them, if you incorrectly paraphrase text that is easily accessible if makes you look incompetent.
Not directly referencing the text you are paraphrasing because it wouldn't help your pseudo argument if you did, is also a weak move.
a bit further down is :
and that has a specific context attached to it, arguing against a point while pretending the clearly established context doesn't exist is also not a good look.
This is somewhat disappointing, at least come up with something that will hold up to more than 10 seconds of scrutiny.
Oh my god shut the fuck up moron, you already admitted you don't have a clue what you're talking about why are you still shitting paragraphs
A masterful retort.
Still not what I said, but at least you're consistent, if not interesting.
You may now shut the fuck up
And again, as I said ,all of that was In response to specific context.
Amongst all of the other replies that you've conveniently ignored.
Taking quotes from a specific context and pretending they apply overall is poor reasoning. Again congrats on the consistency.
I suspect you aren't going to understand what I mean though (intentionally probably, but possibly just struggling).
Tell you what, you win, congrats on your intellectual triumph, a victory truly earned.
indeed, your witty repartee and peerless argumentative structure have left me nowhere to hide, conversationally speaking.
Even the animated equivalent of a "no u" was a masterstroke, perfectly timed to wound me.
I am bested.
Yep
From your post history there are so many wins I’m surprised i lasted as long as i did.
I should really research before i try and take on the champ.
Yes
Indeed, this thorough trouncing has really put things into perspective for me.
Quit lying, you didn't learn anything
My respect for your opinion is such that your lack of belief in me is a wound that will take much time to heal.
Wordy, still stupid
See , this is why i had no chance from the beginning.
Simple, concise, cutting.
You don't even need to understand what i said because your retorts don't require it. Genius.
See, no relevance to the response required.
It doesn't even need to make sense.
Still devastating in it's efficacy.
I'll look into a way to archive Lemmy threads so that future generations might benefit from access to the raw brilliance.
Rather than some paraphrased anecdote.
Masterful
Consistently insightful, no needless words, astounding.
Yep