389
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Jankatarch@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaredwhite@humansare.social 8 points 1 month ago

No, even in the absolute best case scenario, the LLM analysis is a trailing indicator. There's no way that it indicates current views, just possibly an indication of past views.

Personally I think this entire line of thinking ("silicon sampling") is dangerous af.

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's a good point, although I imagine a dedicated company could refine a model using more recently sampled general data to improve the recency.

[-] jaredwhite@humansare.social 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm not saying a tool akin to LLMs can't be used as part of a suite of software workflows for parsing through and analyzing large datasets (seems rather obvious to say that), but forgoing the real work of live data gathering and statistics evaluation in order to do a sort of "vibe polling" sounds extremely off to me.

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I agree, which is why I find the results they got interesting, the fact that the initial study was able to, arguably quite correctly (well, debatable if it was correct, as I pointed out their results are not the easiest to evaluate), predict real results is pretty impressive.

this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
389 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7050 readers
1630 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS