222

Democrats spent the last year asking where their Joe Rogan was. Hasan Piker is one of the few left-wing figures with the audience they covet — but the party is deeply hostile to the spontaneity and independence that make figures like him appealing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

None of that is going to stop ICE gestapo from dragging you off to a concentration camp for being a leftist.

[-] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

lololol ICE doesn't do that. If they did, there would be no one left on Lemmy! I was born a raised in the US, and my family was too, for generations. Ain't no one coming for me, brother. lol

Besides, ICE wouldn't even be able to find this village. I'd love to see them try to get here! lololol

The party I voted for would have dismantled them. Democrats wouldn't have.

Interesting fact about how Democratic Party has dealt with ICE in the past:

Under President Obama (2009–2017, Democratic administration): Record-high formal removals (“deportations”): The Obama administration carried out more than 3.1 million ICE removals over eight years, with a peak of over 407,000 in fiscal year 2012 alone. An increase of over 70% in criminal removals compared to the final year of the prior (Bush) administration.

Expanded programs: Obama expanded the Bush-era Secure Communities program, which led to more local-federal cooperation for identifying and removing people with criminal records (or sometimes minor offenses). Critics on the left called him “deporter-in-chief” because of the scale.

Under President Biden (2021–January 2025, Democratic administration):

Continued large-scale removals and returns: Through early 2024, the Biden administration had carried out about 1.1 million formal deportations (removals/returns), on pace to match or approach Trump’s first-term totals in similar categories. In addition, there were roughly 3 million Title 42 expulsions at the border (pandemic-era public-health returns, overwhelmingly under Biden).

These are straight from government data and nonpartisan trackers like the Migration Policy Institute and Pew.

So like I said, both parties suck. The party I voted for wouldn't have done that shit. That's why I voted for them, and why I didn't vote republican or democrat. :)

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

lololol ICE doesn’t do that.

Yet. They're already openly talking about purging 100 million people, and a lot of them would certainly be natural-born citizens.

Interesting fact about how Democratic Party has dealt with ICE in the past:

Irrelevant. It's unfortunate but acceptable for larger numbers of people to be removed, if they have due process and thus actually "deserved" (in the view of the law) to be removed.

What matters is that Trump is using ICE to do things like terrorize brown people's neighborhoods, imprison people in concentration camps en masse without due process, illegally rendition people to foreign prisons, and murder protestors in the street.

[-] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 1 points 4 months ago

They’re already openly talking about purging 100 million people, and a lot of them would certainly be natural-born citizens.

Hasn't happened. Won't happen.

Irrelevant.

Very relevant. You are wondering why so many people are against the Democratic party now. That's one of the reasons. All of this could have been avoided if the Democrats really cared about people and picked good candidates. They lost to Trump TWICE!

Twice! Think about that. You can keep simping for them all you want, but I'll vote for who I want to win. No nose holding for me. :)

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
222 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1699 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS