544
submitted 2 months ago by xkcdbot@lemmy.world to c/xkcd@lemmy.world

xkcd #3225: Satellite Pollution

Title text:

We're working to make sure the images are as up-to-date and accurate as possible, with a minimum number of sponsored galaxies.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3225/

explainxkcd for #3225

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] raman_klogius@ani.social 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Who would've thought that astronomy as a science only had like 500 years window to the clear sky... That any advanced enough civilization would as quickly and enthusiastically blot out their own skies for short term gains...

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 22 points 2 months ago

Not any advanced enough civilization.

Though a civilization based on capitalism where the greediest fucks get to hoard wealth and resources and get away with doing what ever they want? Yes.

[-] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 12 points 2 months ago

Wouldn’t it be wild to find out that the galaxy is teeming with advanced intelligent life but they want nothing to do with us because literally all of them are peaceful?

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Would be the least surprising thing, out of all the advanced civilizations actually existing options.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

it's bigger than that.

humans looked to the skies and saw gods, and now? most people haven't seen the stars anymore. we, humans have killed those gods and removed the stars from the skies.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Even in recent movies, when people look at the stars, they are mostly not there anymore.

[-] Moah 5 points 2 months ago

Don't forget "set the atmosphere on fire to put them up there"

[-] Anaeijon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

ground based astronomy

Advancing astronomy would require more orbital telescopes anyway, which solve a bunch of problems, like atmospheric distortion.

The actual problem is, that we currently fund short term gains (sattelites for communication and navigation) more than we fund long-term societal gains (sattelites for orbital research).

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Ah, but you're falling for the delusion that capitalism is inevitable...

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

An actually advanced society would fund science more effectively and actually have loads of orbital telescopes.

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
544 points (100.0% liked)

xkcd

16611 readers
40 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS