20
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by sbeak@sopuli.xyz to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

Far too much food is just binned if somebody is too full, needs to leave early, or similar, and if food wasn't wasted, there would not be nearly as large of a hunger crisis. Encouraging the reduction of food waste is great, but I'm wondering whether the inevitable food waste could be collected in special bins and be reprocessed into a mixture of various foods, a bit like recycled plastic almost. This obviously could be bad for those with allergies, and there's no clear expiry date for such a mixed assortment of food. There is also the trouble of people throwing in non food items, like tissues and plastic wrapping. This is already a big problem in recycling!

An alternative could be to separate food waste into multiple bins (meats, vegetables, nuts, dairy, etc.) that could be individually processed, kind of like how recycling is separated into paper, plastic, and cans. Then, allergens could be separated, vegetarian unfriendly products too, and the reprocessed food would be less of a mix and could be portioned into balanced diets.

Some food waste is already processed to become compost, but I'm wondering whether it's possible for reprocessed food waste to be edible and eaten over being dumped in landfills?

edit: mmm yep looks like a really good way to catch all sorts of nasty pathogens. Varied expiry dates also sounds pretty bad. Maybe not a good idea. And yeah, it does sound pretty nasty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Maybe feed the scraps to chickens then eat their eggs? Seems cleaner and easier.

I would much rather that than eating someone else's roats lamb from a month ago, even if it were "processed" (I guess you mean dehydrated ?)

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

That's cruel and requires violence. There are situations that justify cruelty and violence, but given that there is no food scarcity, it is not justified now.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Feeding chickens and eating eggs is cruel and violent?

I'd love to hear your misguided reasoning.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Individuals must be treated as ends, never as means.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I have cats. Aside from rodent control, they don't serve any purpose other than being part of the family. If my cats somehow had the ability to lay eggs, and since they are all fixed these are unfertilized eggs with no possibility of bearing offspring. Would it be wrong if me to make an omelette from them?

I might have made it more weird by using my cats.

But if you had a few chickens and provided them food and shelter and took good care of them, like you would any pet, why not use their eggs? They're going to lay them either way. Is it more moral to throw them away?

[-] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

I said eggs not butchering them for meat !!!

Explain yourself.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm sorry, you cannot exploit the body of an individual against their will without cruelty and violence. This is a terrible thing to come to terms with, but I hope you try to. There is no way around it short of abject denial.

Here is some factual information about how egg laying hens (and their brothers, who are macerated alive in a blender within hours of hatching) necessarily suffer atrocity under the economic realities that rule them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQRAfJyEsko&t=1400s

[-] endlesseden@pyfedi.deep-rose.org 3 points 21 hours ago

not op, but I assume they are vegan. many vegans have the misconception any product from a animal is violence against them. as they cannot consent...

but the truth is, no vegans live on farms... they don't understand chickens lay unfirtalized eggs regardless.

they also see the breeding programs of chickens as violent as it's for producing meat/eggs. so by raising chickens you are perpetuating it... but that's stupid. that's like seeing a hurt dog by the side of the road and saying "if we help that one we have to help all of them". baby chicks are often given away not sold...

[-] IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

Just to add, a lot of vegans (not all) ride their high-horse on their moral high-ground and judge, if not outright insult/shame non-vegans for their choice to not be vegan. A lot like how many religions shame each other for not believing the 'right' thing.

'A few bad apples spoil the bunch,' as they say. The most vocal also make the group as a whole, difficult to tolerate.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47305 readers
654 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS