1893
Dumb glasses (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 10 points 5 months ago

Stop advocating violence against people who might be recording video in public, just because the device doing it is on their face.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 90 points 5 months ago

You actually should advocate for violence against people who are violating your rights

[-] lumen@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

What right would be violated here exactly?

[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

facebook knowing my personal information against my will goes against my right to privacy. there are also the ethics of recording people in secret instead of making it very obvious. no, a blinking red dot does not count, and it can also be covered with a special purpose-made made black sticker.

now that i think about it, I'm just not comfortable being filmed without consent by strangers at all, in any way, regardless of where the images end up.

i don't think people should get used to it either. it's incredibly creepy, even if no law is broken where you live.

and yes, i do understand that in many places just being in public reduces your right to privacy so that you're legally allowed to be photographed as long as you're not the focus. i don't care. still creepy.

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

If recording in public wasn't legal, then cops could legally arrest you for filming them brutalizing people for no reason.

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 5 points 5 months ago

I'm sure you're aware while you traverse in public you are on camera pretty much the entire time, right? There are cameras everywhere always filming, some you know about and can clearly see, some you will never know about and never see. Your face is in a database whether you consent or not.

The part about Facebook knowing your information without your consent? Do you have an account with them?

[-] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 5 months ago

i know, doesn't change my stance. i don't have a facebook account, at most a shadow profile because others may talk about me

[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

The proliferation of cameras in public is not a good thing. I am yet to see data showing it reduces criminality (supposed to be the intent), meanwhile it's a massive surveillance system.

And the fact that a given situation is bad is hardly a good argument to promote making it worse.

Meta collects data on everyone: from contact info in cellphone through their apps, uploaded photos, videos etc. If you don't have an account nor consent to anything, they will just not show the data, but will still build the profile combining different sources and feed it to its algorithms.

It has been a well known practice for many years.

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Facebook has a profile on everyone. Accounts or not. They are just like every other data broker. All they want is access to more data and more data.

All that medical data is the holy grail.... Anyone who thinks medical data will remain private is naive. All it takes is very deep pockets and lawmakers who want contributions to change the laws.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

*Unless Facebook does the unreasonable searching and we pay them for any data they collect

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 7 points 5 months ago

Funny how people think they have a "right" of privacy in public.. there is absolutely no expectation of privacy in public. Besides, there are cameras EVERYWHERE always filming.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 15 points 5 months ago

This only makes sense if you imagine rights are granted to you by your wise and benevolent king when he's in a good mood and no one else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Gee.. try hanging out at a playground with these glasses and get back to us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 5 months ago

You don't have the right not to be filmed in public. Do you punch every person filming in public? and if you punch someone wearing the glasses, most likely they weren't even recording.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

*Unless Facebook is the one doing the unreasonable search, and we simply buy their data

most likely they weren't even recording.

Sweet summer child

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EisFrei@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

You do in Germany, except during events/gatherings/marches.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 5 months ago

I am aware. If the yanks want to copy it then they should

  1. overthrow the orange turd
  2. campaign for it democratically

not go around punching people for violating a legal right they do not have. Your discomfort at maybe having your picture doesn't entitle you to violence.

[-] srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago

You don't have the right not to be filmed in public.

Uhhhh, you actually do.* I am not sure if you know, but different places have different laws.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If I see someone filming me, I ask them to stop. That will escalate if they don’t.

I think what people are missing here is the intention. There’s generalised filming of your surroundings, surveillance cameras…these glasses are intended for use in a social capacity. That will move into privacy issues and perverted use.

These peoples right to use these glasses, as far as I’m concerned, does not eclipse my privacy or lack of desire to be filmed and put on Metas platforms and if I find someone using them on me they’ll be fucking told.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Truscape 42 points 5 months ago

A clear violation of the social contract deserves a swift response. Those glasses come off your face, and onto the pavement.

[-] lumen@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago

No they don’t. I might actually go film on the sidewalk just outside your home, and there would be nothing at all you can do about it.

[-] nile_istic@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I think the real problem is that you don't seem to realize/care how gross and rapey you sound. That's... maybe something to work on.

[-] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

This may be perfectly legal but it is absolutely a dick move and people will HATE you for it. The are so many scenarios where perfectly reasonable people will find this behavior extremely unsettling, at best, and possibly threatening.

And you are incorrect in assuming that “there would be nothing [the subject] can do about it “. In the real world there are plenty of people who will risk an assault charge to deal with someone being a disrespectful dick, and many more who will act if they feel threatened.

Now, might doesn’t make right, but are you right? Going against social norms and risking extrajudicial retaliation to fight injustice is commendable. But this isn’t sitting at a lunch counter during segregation or protesting at Stonewall. In a world where 1 in 3 women will be stalked in her lifetime ( in the US according to the Justice Department), why is this the hill you want to die upon?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago

Who made this social contract? I certainly didn't. You want to be able to tell everyone else what the social contract is, and assault them if they don't comply.

Fascist.

[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

When you say "fascist", you do realize that fascism involves crowd control and these glasses are a dream for a fascist regime? All the speech about "cameras everywhere is ok" falls right in the authoritarianism thinking, that's just a step from fascism.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

This account ^ is going very far out of its way to make very bad points and overlook obvious gaping privacy violations, which are things that can be both identified and stopped.

The takeaway of massively privacy invading glasses is they can always be stopped at both the individual and the systemic level.

[-] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 months ago

It's easy to see someone holding up a camera or cell phone making it obvious they are recording. If you don't want to be recorded, you can just stay the fuck away from them. You can't avoid cameras/recording devices you can't see. Fuck meta, and fuck anyone else wearing their garbage, privacy invading glasses.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
1893 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41518 readers
3758 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS