242
Retro yet? (sh.itjust.works)

Or do we need another decade before we can call IPod games retro?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Being a Millennial and older now is like what being a 500 year old immortal would have been back when it took that long to see meaningful technological change.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Exactly.

Imagine a 13 year old kid now-gtav is the same age as them and they're still playing it.

Thats the crazy thing. Advancment peaked.

Imagine playing a 13 year old game in the ps1 era. WAY different.

[-] Redkey@programming.dev 2 points 21 hours ago

I remember the first time I really sat down and played (and finished) the original Legend of Zelda was in the late 90s, well into the PS1 era and 11-13 years after the game was released. Although admittedly, I was a bit older than 13.

Good games are always good games. Once someone is mature enough to see past the historical limitations, they don't seem to matter nearly as much. Last year I saw some tweens commenting about how PS3 games are "unplayable" now, and I laughed. Yeah, that's why no-one plays chess or poker any more. "You mean you have to use your hands? That's like a baby's game!"

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Omg. I used that exact bttf quote a few weeks ago for something similar!!

Graphics have never mattered to me. They're a party trick.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
242 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

27981 readers
47 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS