2153
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Students in Massachusetts will get free lunch and breakfast at school thanks to a new 4% tax put on people who earn more than $1 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Good. Now slap a 0 to the end of that 4, and then double it.

[-] wrath-sedan@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

Made me curious what the total tax rate would be in Mass. Apparently it has a flat 5% income tax, plus 4% millionaires tax, plus federal rate for income over about 578k is 37%, so altogether it’s 46% for income over a mil in Mass.

Definitely think it should be higher for such wildly high income. Also disappointed to see for being a relatively progressive state Mass has a flat rather than progressive income tax.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Definitely think it should be higher for such wildly high income.

Higher, nothing. There should be a rate above which it's taxed at 100%. No one needs to be as rich as Musk or Zuckerberg or Bezos.

[-] BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 years ago

And no millioneir will keep his money in a state where those are the tax rates. If you make it too high you literally get nothing.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Awww. Too bad for them. What will we do without millionaires hoarding their wealth?!

[-] uberkalden@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

No, he's saying they will keep it. Just in a way that mass gets literally nothing

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

So either they will get a lot of money or things won't be any different except millionaires won't be there hoarding wealth?

I'm not seeing a downside yet.

[-] doyoulikemyparka@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago

I think they mean the millionaires will find other ways to hoard it to avoid tax levels they won't stomach. Fair? No. Reality? Probably.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

People make the same argument about not returning to the tax rates of the 1950s. I say let's try it and find out.

[-] doyoulikemyparka@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

I ... honestly would be up for this approach. When do you run for office, sir?

[-] yoyogamer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And yet you guys wonder why millionaires move to Texas. You increase the taxes above a certain number and they'll take all their wealth, consumption and their taxes to another state.

Taxes should be sustainable. High taxes on rich people aren't sustainable because they'll leave taking whatever taxes they pay and whatever consumption they do which contributes to the economy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

The wealth that they hoard? The consumption they import? Let me guess, they're also "job creators."

[-] yoyogamer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

A corporation. Not a rich individual.

[-] yoyogamer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Who do you think created these corporations? Rich people with aim to make more money.

Capitalism pays your salary. Without capitalism and with theft of wealth via unfair taxation, your job won't exist.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Rich people do not need to exist for corporations to exist. Also, you think wage theft doesn't happen under capitalism?

According to the Economic Policy Institute, wage theft costs U.S. workers as much as $50 billion per year — a number far higher than all robberies, burglaries and motor vehicle thefts combined.

https://inthesetimes.com/article/wage-theft-union-labor-biden-iupat

All right! Go capitalism!

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

As your income increases, your ability to reduce taxable income also increases. The goal of the state is basically to target the lazy.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure at an 80% rate the millionaires would just spend the rate moving, out of state or out of country depending on how far reaching it was.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago

And nothing of value was lost...

Like, oh no, what would a state do without their money hoarding exploiters that alredy contribute less than the bare minimum???
And worse - if everyone decided to make these laws, where will the poor millionaires escape to then???

Oh, won't someone think of the millionaires!!!11

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

And nothing of value was lost...

Except the taxable income you wanted to tax?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

You mean the money that we already aren't getting?

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

I don't want to tax, I want to eat.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Oh look, someone else who doesn't understand how progressive tax brackets work. Their effective tax rate wouldn't be 80%, only income above a certain (very high) number would be taxed at 80%.

[-] don@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

That’s exactly how that would go.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

Then we’d be rid of them at least

[-] don@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

In other words, “Don’t provide children with free meals.”

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
2153 points (100.0% liked)

News

25286 readers
3362 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS