58

I think this recent post by AI industry CEO Matt Shumer is worth a read. In it, he basically explains how quickly LLMs (large language models) are evolving to supplant many developers and programmers, and how that disruption is coming to other industries quickly. He also warns critics of AI to adjust their priors and realize the AI tools you mocked just six months ago, aren’t the ones in use today:

“I am no longer needed for the actual technical work of my job. I describe what I want built, in plain English, and it just… appears. Not a rough draft I need to fix. The finished thing. I tell the AI what I want, walk away from my computer for four hours, and come back to find the work done. Done well, done better than I would have done it myself, with no corrections needed. A couple of months ago, I was going back and forth with the AI, guiding it, making edits. Now I just describe the outcome and leave.”

While the post is interesting (with the understanding this is somebody making and selling automation software), you might notice something: absolutely nowhere in the blog post does he meaningfully acknowledge the widespread problems with existing AI use. Either because his financial self-interest doesn’t allow for honest acknowledgment of them, or because he simply doesn’t find those aspects all that interesting.

Maybe both.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm fully in favor of using the power of the state to regulate AI data centers so that they're not exploitative to local resource limitations. I'm fully in favor of rewriting copyright law from the ground up for the modern era, to the extent that I think copyright should exist at all. I'm in favor of researching model-human interactions and assessing well-being of users and coming up with some forms of agency-respecting safeguards. I'm more than fully in favor of reigning in billionaire corporations whose only motive is profit and taxing the ever-loving shit out of them.

What I'm not in favor of us restricting the technology as a whole or acting like its use or even its very existence is a moral failure. I'm not in favor of stripping agency from adults because you think you know what's best for them.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 9 hours ago

I'd be totally fine with either a system like drug patents that expire in (comparatively) short order or just the rest of the creator's life. Life plus anything is an absurd construction that upends copyright as a means of encouraging artistic works. "I'll make another album so my kids don't have to work" is not the correct motivation in any situation.

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42471 readers
495 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS