934
signal w (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 weeks ago by not_IO to c/privacy@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That seems a little disingenuous. Just because email can't be protected well in most cases, doesn't mean you can't have a service that cares about privacy and does whatever is possible.

Google can train AI on your email, and then when I go make an alternative that doesn't do that, you will say I don't care about privacy? What is that, no true Scotsman? Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. Even with all these issues, Proton is more private than Gmail.

[-] notabot@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

They provide a suite of services, most of which can be provided in a private manner. Blowing a hole in that by providing email seems counter productive. As I said, they could point you at a separate email service. Even if they provided that service it could ensure an adaquate break between the private services and and the non-private.

As a service, is it more privacy conscious than, say, Gmail? Yes, but you're still ultimately just asking the postman not to read your postcards.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
934 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

9393 readers
73 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS