932
submitted 20 hours ago by not_IO to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 54 points 13 hours ago

Raises uncomfortable questions about consciousness. The only difference between these neurons and your own are the number of them and the structures they form. Of course it doesn't know what it's doing, but... Neither do our own neurons

[-] KindnessisPunk@piefed.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

I mean it's the same question we've been asking all our lives about the animals, fetuses and now AI. When does it stop being a flowchart and start being a consciousness.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 10 points 9 hours ago

Science and Ethics — the age old enmity between "I wanna know" and "I'm not allowed to find out"

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Science and Ethics — the age old enmity between "I wanna know" and ~~"I'm not allowed to find out"~~ "Am I able to find out without doing something monstrously inhumane"

FTFY

I guess my point is that sometimes even if it's illegal you can get away with it if done correctly, with ruling party aligned stated goals....or you have access to a shit tonne of money and powerful friends.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago

I simplified for comedic effect. You're absolutely right that the "compromise" would be finding some humane and ethical solution, but "The most effective and direct way of finding out is cruel and callous" isn't quite as snappy.

I guess my point is that sometimes even if it's illegal you can get away with it if done correctly, with ruling party aligned stated goals....or you have access to a shit tonne of money and powerful friends.

That kinda dodges the conflict by not engaging with ethical concerns at all. I feel like calling it a solution would be morbid, but it does make the problem stop being a problem...

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

That kinda dodges the conflict by not engaging with ethical concerns at all.

I guess I...kinda lost the plot a bit when I wrote the second part, eh?

There's ethics...and then there's what the government in the country a scientist operates in views as "morally and ethically acceptable".
Stem cell research was banned in most places for a long time. The US is banning CRISPR, if I remember right, the OG Nazis, Soviets and Empire of Japan (and honestly basically everyone else too, just those are the three that were highlighted when I was in school) rubber-stamped and funded research that should warrant execution by vivisection...die by your own methods and all that.

You're right it's not really a solution. However the realities of modern society means that there's room within what is morally and ethically acceptable in any country to operate in both a humane and inhumane fashion. And if it doesn't then money and connections to those in power allow further leeway to be an example of humanity at it's best....or a monster in a human suit....

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 32 minutes ago

I guess I...kinda lost the plot a bit when I wrote the second part, eh?

I think I got where you were going, I was just saying that someone trying to find a way around the legal restrictions indicates they're not actually concerned about ethics, just about not getting in trouble for it. In that context, the problem "How do I do this in an ethically acceptable manner?" is "solved" with the answer "I don't care".

Generally, laws are the standard solution to ambiguities. Ethics are a murky and often subjective topic, so it makes sense to form some sort of common agreement on what is okay and what isn't. And where there are laws, there are gonna be cunts proving exactly why we had to write it down in the first place...

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Nueralink did pretty much the same thing to monkeys that are actually conscious. So it this different only because those are human neurons? Is human consciousness different than animal consciousness?

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 17 points 10 hours ago

i dont think op made a mutually exclusive statement?...

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I'm not sure this is quite analagous to neuralink's monkey experiments. That said,

So is this different only because those are human neurons?

To my mind, a neuron is a neuron. The only difference between your brain and a monkey brain is, again, the number of neurons and the structures they form. I don't see this as any different from monkey or rat or ant or entirely digital neurons.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 10 hours ago

I’m not sure this is quite analagous to neuralink’s monkey experiments.

Why not? It's a chip reading inputs from neurons. This meme doesn't make it clear if the chip was also stimulation neurons but Neuralink has plans for neural stimulation and it's possible this was also tested on monkeys. So what's the difference?

[-] dtaylor84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago

You seem to be arguing against a point that no one has made.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 8 hours ago

You seem not to understand what is being discussed here.

[-] dtaylor84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 hours ago

Correct. That was basically my point -- I don't think anything is being discussed, people are talking past each other.

[-] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

Sounds like those are uncomfortable questions being raised...

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Yes. Because it's us. Anything not us is always going to be less valuable. You'd kill 100 lions if it means saving 1 human.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 10 hours ago

Lions are not conscious. And I'm not asking about value. Of course we value human consciousness more than monkey consciousness. We don't grant monkeys any rights. Hell, we assign more value to unconscious (brain dead) humans than to conscious monkeys. But how exactly is human consciousness different?

[-] UnhingedFridge@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

What leads you to assume that lions lack consciousness exactly?

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Shit, turns out lions are conscious! They are just stupid. Stephen Hawking said it in 2012. I honestly didn't know that.

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

That was just to try and make the equipment work at all, it wasn't about doing anything with software. It's the opposite where you're only worried about the physical damage and infection.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 7 hours ago

I was focusing more on the "hooking up conscious brain to computer" part than about the damage and infection part.

Thought experiment: let's say we have a dead brain patient. You have verified that there is no neural activity in the brain beyond cerebellum. There's no consciousness in the brain. Legally it's still considered a person. You can't for example shoot them.

We also have a 5kg blob of lab grown human brain tissue. We have verified there is neural activity in the entire blob but we don't know what it's doing and we can't communicate with it.

Which one is more conscious? Which one should be considered more human and should have more rights?

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 4 points 10 hours ago

And now bring artificial neural networks, i.e., AI, into the picture to make it even more spicy.

[-] ziproot@lemmy.ml 7 points 13 hours ago

Do those neurons interact with hormones like mine do?

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
932 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38391 readers
4118 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS