114
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 24 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I mean, what's the alternative here? The Swiss government, which they are subject to, issued a legal warrant. Any email provider you want to use will be subject to warrants. All of them.

They are technically incapable by design of complying with warrants for email data. In this case they were able to provide personally identifying payment data because the person paid for their account with... a credit card. They offer crypto payment options, and would not have been able to usefully comply had the person used that method.

[-] Cevilia 4 points 1 hour ago

The alternative is literally a single sentence: "That person paid by crypto, we have no payment details on file for them."

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
114 points (100.0% liked)

Actually Infuriating

915 readers
141 users here now

Community Rules:

Be CivilPlease treat others with decency. No bigotry (disparaging comments about any race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, nationality, ability, age, etc). Personal attacks and bad-faith argumentation are not allowed.

Content should be actually infuriatingPolitics and news are allowed, as well as everyday life. However, please consider posting in partner communities below if it is a better fit.

Mark NSFW/NSFL postsPlease mark anything distressing (death, gore, etc.) as NSFW and clearly label it in the title.

Keep it Legal and MoralNo promoting violence, DOXXing, brigading, harassment, misinformation, spam, etc.

Partner Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS