91
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
91 points (100.0% liked)
Anarchism
3044 readers
35 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- !anarchism@slrpnk.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !anarchism@hexbear.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.ml
- !anarchism101@lemmy.ca
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
:D are tou sure about it?
Have you perchance ever read anything by Marx, my sweet Marxists? Or talked about bureaucracy with communists not from China?
Since you didn't, in marxist theory state bureaucracy is distinctly never a part of working class. Iirc the quote, it's always "appalling parasitic body".
And honestly, thinking that administrations are worker class... Like damn.
Unless you claim tautology?
NPC not made from working class representatives is socialist, because China is socialist. China is socialist because it's ruled by socialist government, although not made from working class representatives?
(Before talking to you I honestly thought this duck looks less like capitalistic duck).
I've read Marx, quite a lot, actually.
He was talking about the French state. You're actually taking a metaphysical approach to Marx, not a dialectical one, by trying to abstract points away from the necessary context they exist in.
Classes are social relations to production and distribution. When production is collectivized and owned by all, it still needs managers, what Engels refers to as the "administration of things." Further still, between capitalism and communism there is the transition from one to the other, that is still heavily made up of elements of the old as elements of the new grow and overtake it.
This is basic dialectics.