529
Holding up the line
(media.piefed.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
529 points (100.0% liked)
RPGMemes
15729 readers
479 users here now
Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Unless some cataclysmic event has befallen the battlefield or a primary target or ally just died your turn should be no more than 1 minute at the longest.
I'm in a weird spot rn where I'm nostalgic for playing on roll20 because I wanted the 'genuine experience' of playing in person.
"I cast Invisibility"
"You can't"
"Yes I can"
"No, you can't, you're in the Antimagic Field"
"No, I'm not. I'm on the edge of the field. Look at the table."
"There's still a corner of the field in the square."
"Then I don't stand in that corner."
"The rules say it doesn't matter."
"No they don't. It has to occupy at least 40% of the square."
"Yes it does. Look, its right here in the DM's guide."
"That's the 4.32 manual. You need to check the rules updates from 4.71"
"I'm not using 4.71 rules."
"You referenced a 4.82 rule just a turn ago!"
"No I didn't, that was a house rule."
"That's not anywhere in the house rule guide! I was just reading it before I cast my spell."
"Well, I sent out an email two months ago."
"GUYS! Just make a decision and move ON!"
"Okay, fine. I take a five foot step and cast Invisibility."
"My hydra gets an AoO. I roll a 43 and deal 290 points of damage. Your wizard dies."
"THIS IS BULLSHIT!"
Just let them cast the spell and labour under the misapprehension they are invisible until they pass a perception roll.
"I cast invisible"
"The hydra takes an AoO"
Queue from the top
It's the same argument. The fundamental problem is that magic as a system doesn't play well with rules as a concept
Yeah, half the time magic is specifically about ~~breaking the rules~~ adding a more specific rule for a specific instance, which of course makes everything turn into the rules lawyer heaven.
As a personal experience, mutants&masterminds is just, so, horrible about the arguments for how powers interact, and they didn't help by mixing fuzzy and binary rules.
👹
I've never played. But if that's the Palladium version and it's adjacent to Rifts... ye-gods. Why even have game mechanics at all? Just give us the setting material and a bag full of random dice mixed with cheetos and Chucky Cheese tokens.
I remember people excitedly snapping up the d20 version of Exalted back in their 2e, almost entirely because they adored the world but despised the White Wolf mechanics. Also seen some decent mileage taking games like this to FATE or Big Eyes Small Mouth, just because it does become much more of a narrative auction than a dice game.
Heh, hell for the rest of us, but rules lawyers are as happy as a pig in mud.
I don't remember which version of M&M it was, just that there were fuzzy rules regarding stuff around senses, and hard binaries within those fuzzy rules. I get it, of course trying to make rules that cover everything ever in comic books isn't going to be easy... but still, it was atrocious when you found yourself playing with someone who 'knew the rules.' I even remember a few posts on some forums about how M&M took the concept of d&d's 'fighters are for dumb people, wizards are for smart people' philosophy and just made it even more important and people lapped it up as if it was a good thing!
Fate is definitely among my top games. I recommend it to everyone who brings up gaming, but I never seem to be able to get into a group with it these days. I personally hate d&d for how it not only is the name everyone knows, but somehow has cemented itself as the only game people are willing to play.
In my experience, rules lawyers get a certain special high from remembering some obscure piece of info and digging it out at the right moment. It's their own special kind of magic. And - from time to time - it does make the game better, because you've got a guy who can say "Actually there IS a rule for jumping off a cliff, grabbing onto a big vine, and swinging onto the back of the rampaging Wyvern".
But when the DM thinks they know the rules and the Player thinks they know the rules, and then they spend half an hour arguing over the results of a dice roll, it is my experience that neither of them walk away from the table happier than when they started. The best you can ever get is the table stakes and the worst you get is feeling robbed or cheated.
The d20 system is pretty quick to pick up but contains enough depth to allow for wide variations in setting and style. So many of the variants are just right there at surface level. Nobody has to work hard to make fireballing a goblin legion or sneak attacking a mind flayer cooler than it already is.
FATE is perhaps too vanilla and really relies on the players/DMs to pick up the slack in their descriptions. The fundamental problem with a very story-based game is where you go with it when other people at the table just aren't exciting enough to keep it compelling. Easy to say "I like this system over that system" when what you really liked was the group of Theater Kids (or just the friends you knew with a good set of in-jokes) that made the game pop.
I know a few friends who swear by Call of Cthulhu as a system. But their DM is a phenomenal amateur horror writer. So, I feel like it isn't the system that's doing a lot of the work.