cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7804222
You can tell this is fake because the USA soldier would shoot the child as well
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.
If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.
Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!
0. Only post socialist memes
That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)
0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility
(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)
We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.
We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.
When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.
0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms
When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart
Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them
1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here
Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.
2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such
That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.
3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.
That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).
4. No Bigotry.
The only dangerous minority is the rich.
5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.
(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)
6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.
I never said anything about orc people. Russian infantry have a reputation for brutality towards civilians and it's earned. They don't even really try to hide it. Russian isn't a "race". Also, what do you expect when Russia slaughters civilians wholesale and relies almost entirely on "meat wave" tactics. Whether the comparison to orcs is racist can be debated, but it's clear where it comes from.
My claim about US troops was that they were less terrible. Unfortunately, moral ground troops are hard to find in today's world. I also said they were better trained at certain things, and I stand by it. That's not in spite of their many deployments, it's because of it.
If you want to know about the PLA I suggest asking someone who faught them. Perhaps Japan. If you want more recent, then look at the tens of thousands of Tibetan civilians that were killed - most in labor camps. That's a bit worse than "collateral damage" from an errant missile. (And yeah, if it was an Israeli missile I think an investigation into how "accidental" it was is warranted.
I was also very critical of IS decisions to go to war in the first place and how they justify it, so what the fuck are you talking about? I'm not "sneaking" anything in. I said what I said because it was precisely what I meant.
Unlike you I don't pick a team before making my conclusions. There is shit that's good about the US, and stuff that isn't. Same is true of China. As for Russia and Israel, I'd love to say something good about them, but they make it pretty tough.
The fact that you think the US is better than Russia says enough about your imperial chauvinism, in my opinion. There's only one part of this comment I'll even bother replying to.
You barely even took a sentence to go from "I didn't call them orc people" to defending calling them orc people. Again, I don't know who you think you're fooling with these kinds of rhetorical contortions.
Cancer is better than Russia, so that's no great achievement. My comment was that there is not much good to say about Russia. I notice you didn't point out something I missed, you just went straight to an ad hominem.
Yes, my point was both that I didn't say the thing you claimed was racist, and that it wouldn't have been racist anyways. No contortion, just you being wrong twice in one statement. And, again, you didn't bother arguing the point, you just went for yet another ad hominem. That's three if you count calling me racist.
Yeah, you said they weren't a race? So it's not racist to call an ethnicity orcs, because ethnicity is not race? That's barely an argument, though it is a racist one.
You are being racist. Even if you had said nothing else, the only reason to believe the US is acceptable in any way while Russia isn't is racism and chauvinism. As I said above, you did say something else and it was racist.
I suspect all this "ad hominem" nonsense is posturing, but if you really think you're doing some great debate here, don't bother replying. I have no interest in "debating" with an American chauvinist with a Russia obsession, which I thought I had made clear with my previous replies.
"Russian" is an ethnicity, but it's also a nationality. Since we are talking specifically about Russian troops, its the nationality being criticized, not the ethnicity. Either way, I never called them orcs, I just pointed out that their behavior invites the comparison. You aren't much for subtlety, are you?
Back to the ad hominems, and the misquoting. I never said the US is "acceptable". I have only spoken in favor of a single attribute of US ground troops, and I've been quite clear that there are many aspects of the US that are entirely unacceptable. The current war with Iran is entirely so, as have been many similar adventures.
There is only so "great" one can be at debating when the "arguments" are as bad and fabricated as yours.
Yeah, you just went on a whole roundabout justification of other people doing it, that's very different. Here's a hint: someone who wasn't racist would have said "I never called anyone an orc" instead of doing that.
No, you've just made it clear that you can accept its existence and not the existence of Russia.
You uncritically repeated a single attribute of US ground troop propaganda, actually.
This isn't a "debate", I thought I had been pretty clear about that. I don't care to "debate" with someone who thinks America is better than Russia.
LOL, falling back on "That's propaganda!". The one lame trope you had yet to pull out. Well, calling any argument or fact that favors the west "propaganda" is also propaganda so there! I sure got you good.
It's getting really old pointing this but, no, I didn't say that either. If I tell someone that their behavior is unacceptable, that does not imply that their "existence" is unacceptable. To whatever extent you think I need to say it, I will say that Russia's continued existence is just fine with me. However, I'm done with this bullshit. You win, or whatever.
OK, you can continue to believe the US has particularly moral ground troops whereas Russians are like orcs.
As I said, this isn't a debate. But I agree with you that we have nothing to say to each other.
And yet your jaw keeps flipping.
Don't pretend you're not trying to get the last word, lol.
"I'm not racist but-"
but... what? But the thing you wrongly accused me of saying wouldn't have been racist anyways? That's not exactly the gotcha you were looking for.
Why is everybody from lemmy.ml so disingenuous in their arguments? It's almost like you have no legitimate arguments to make.
You immediately proceeded to weasle-word around saying you have no problem with a racist term
This is racist. You are racist.
Sure buddy.