196
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Parents and teachers who oppose the state policies sued, claiming their parental, free speech and religious rights were violated.

The Supreme Court on Monday barred California from enforcing state rules that restrict when schools can notify parents about students who come out as transgender and requires teachers to use children's preferred pronouns.

The court, on a 6-3 vote on ideological lines, allowed a federal judge’s ruling in favor of parents who oppose the policy on religious grounds to go into effect. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had put the judge’s decision on hold pending further litigation.

The court's ruling focused on the parents' claim that their rights under the free exercise clause of the Constitution's First Amendment were violated. The court also said they have valid parental rights claims under the Constitution's 14th Amendment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Parents generally have the right to know important facts about their children so they can parent well.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

If your kid talks to someone else about something major and important to their lives BEFORE you, you have probably already fucked up as a parent and probably betrayed trust a number of times already. Or been a raging reactionary about something and you have to deal with the consequences of your own behavior by not being a part of your kid's personal life.

Either way, if a kid is old enough to talk about mature subjects about themselves and their lives with anyone, they're also old enough to decide who they feel safe enough to talk to.

This society broadly is riding a really weird line between if we're protecting our kids to the point of treating them like they have no agency at all. Parents have a knee-jerk reactionary behavior that makes them decide protecting a child also means absolutely neutering their ability to make decisions and feel like humans. Make it make sense.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 41 points 1 day ago

If they aren't telling their parents, there is probably a very good reason.

[-] firelight@startrek.website 3 points 18 hours ago

What do you think that reason is?

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 4 points 11 hours ago

Many times, fear of:

  • Being kicked out
  • Being beaten
  • Parents who will try to "make them" not be who they are

So on.

I saw this firsthand with friends in my high school days, and plenty of hard right repubs treat their kids the same way today.

So, IMO, very good reasons to be fearful.

You'll often see in supportive spaces that many will recommend not coming out if they dont know what the parents response will be, or how severe it will be, due to these risks.

[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Kids are inexperienced. It's why we trust parents to raise them into functional adults and to care for them until they are old enough to do it themselves.

Keeping parents in the dark about medical and mental conditions their children face insures kids won't receive proper care and nurturement.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 27 points 22 hours ago

Or it can result in the kid having the piss beaten out of them, like for one poor sod in my middle school class when his father found out he was gay do to a snitch of a teacher. Don't worry though retribution was had.

[-] Cherry@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Kids are inexperienced. And It is the job of the parent to protect them. I don’t know why this comment is so downvoted. It’s pretty rational.

Yeh some parents are arseholes but for the most parents do need awareness so they can have conversations and help their child.

Most 9-11 year olds are getting their world from TicTok. Is that the better alternative to a parent who wants to help?

Not all parents are bad.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Parents who want to parent are free to not let their 9-11 year old get their world from TocTok.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 36 points 1 day ago

Why do children not get any right to privacy at all, like they're just pets or something? There are some who would be put in danger if the parents found out, and they're smart enough to know this, otherwise they'd trust their own parents enough to just tell them instead of a third party.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 23 hours ago

Parents have a right to know what their child trusts them to know. If a kid is withholding information about their identity from their parent, it's because they fear their parents reaction. Parents do not have a right to know any piece of information at any time, nor should it be the responsibility of the school to report it to them.

[-] firelight@startrek.website 3 points 18 hours ago

Parents have a right to know what their child trusts them to know.

Lol.

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

Lol go fuck yourself

[-] firelight@startrek.website 4 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, I don't see the issue here.

Having a law that forbids schools from sharing information about students with their parents is bonkers.

[-] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 9 points 22 hours ago

That's true but if it results in danger or harm to the child, then the parents forfeit that right.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
196 points (100.0% liked)

News

36292 readers
2536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS