356
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by NomNom@feddit.uk to c/europe@feddit.org

QatarEnergy, the world's largest producer of natural gas, just got bombed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago

Including them. They can feel less guilty, but democracy means that the people decide and they are part of the people.

If they don't agree with the vote they have to look for means to convince the rest and change the vote.

[-] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I am willing to accept that for myself.

But when it comes to getting others to act, I would rather use ability/agency than responsibility/guilt.

We can figure our whose job/fault it was later.

Right now, we should do what we can to fix things. (EDIT: added "should" for clarity)

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

Right now, we do what we can to fix things.

Are people doing enough?

Most people don't do what they can.Trump can do whatever he wants because Putin got him elected and most people haven't voted for him, or voted for him and agree.

I hadn't noticed the strong link between guilt and responsibility. I just think that people are responsible. But now it makes sense as a strategy:

This is the point where one person is singled out as the cause of the trouble and is expelled or killed by the group. This person is the scapegoat. Social order is restored as people are contented that they have solved the cause of their problems by removing the scapegoated individual, and the cycle begins again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating#Scapegoat_mechanism

Trump is a scapegoat that takes all the guilt so people are not motivated to act.

Coincidentally this and Girard in general are Peter Thiel's favorite theory so my guess is that it is done on purpose.

Which leaves the question how people can be motivated to act according to their abilities. All the skills are there. How do they know that it is their turn to act to maintain international law?

My bad, I meant "we do" as in "we should do", not "we are doing".

And we can motivate others to do the same by replacing finger-pointing (e.g. "it's your fault for not voting/voting third party" vs "it's your fault for not pressuring Democrats into choosing a decent candidate" or something like that, idk) with mutual support and actionable advice ("it doesn't matter whose fault is it, right now we need all the support we can get. Here's something you can do")

[-] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Are people waiting to do things?

I think people are busy and they need an incentive to prioritize their political engagement. I agree that guilt is a bad motivator and something else would be better.

Still, not wanting to handle guilt seems to be a core mechanism in influencing people. If that's how the population is controlled then the left would have to figure out how to handle it to win back influence.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

At first that was WTF, but you know, now I'm seeing it.

I'd extend that to dictatorships and autocracies as well, since autocrats only have the power people around them give. The thing is, we're all guilty, so kind of nobody is.

[-] Quantillion@mstdn.io 3 points 5 days ago

@CanadaPlus @plyth
So in other words ALL Americans are now bombing schools & arming genocide.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

All people, even, since borders are themselves something that only exist because we acknowledge them. Appropriate username for that.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
356 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

10548 readers
667 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS