view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
"None of the photos of him dead look dead" isn't a great choice as your very first point if you're trying to make a compelling argument.
I have added links. I'll add the other online account if I find it.
O...kay, you got any sources with even a shred of credibility? Because those are links to two random entertainers on youtube, a substack article (yay, nazi news platforms!) and an article that claims to have accessed epstein's FedEx account but doesn't provide even a screenshot as evidence.
While his sources lack credibility, dismissing every substack as a "nazi news platform" is disingenuous
No, not really. Substack is a blog hosting platform that pays it's subscribers - including straight up nazis. While there may be individual substack blogs with journalistic value (although I have never personally seen one) the platform itself is a problem, and much as with twitter, it is perfectly reasonable for me to be skeptical of the people that choose to remain on it.
I'm not chatGPT, I'm not going to do your work for you for free. Those videos show you URLs in the files or... Who am I kidding, you aren't going to do leg work, you're so incredibly intellectually lazy as to write off all of substack and YouTube. GL skid
The only links in the descriptions for those videos are for Dr. G's course, which isn't a good look
Yeah lazy YouTube descriptions suck but the note in his cell is way too much work to parse and he did a good job. Especially with some of that handwriting. Very much worth watching if you're good at deciphering bad handwriting.
Guard transcripts don't need the video you can read those.