766
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I think what's worse is the fact that it's destroyed our trust in one another, causing us to believe things to be AI even if they are not. I ran the article's text through several AI detection services, and while not entirely reliable, they all say it's 100% human written.

[-] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 14 points 2 months ago

AI detectors are completely unreliable and useless. They are AI themselves, and rife with all the problems that other LLMs have.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't disagree, hence my preface, but my initial point still stands regardless.

Too many times I've seen real artists called AI by people when it's clearly real work. Likewise, I've seen AI passed off as legit and people clap their hands awarding praise to those that don't deserve it.

It's all sad as hell.

[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

AI detectors are very unreliable. One OpenAI used to develop had a 20% success rate (approximately).

[-] christian@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's funny that they got it backwards but honestly getting an 80% success rate by picking the opposite is more accurate detection than I would have expected.

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
766 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6993 readers
860 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS