22
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@mander.xyz to c/usa@midwest.social

Virginia Supreme Court rules U.S. Marine’s adoption of an Afghan war orphan will stand The decision most likely ends a bitter, yearslong legal battle over the fate of the girl, whose adoption over the objections of her relatives was criticized by judges in a scathing dissent.

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a U.S. Marine and his wife will keep an Afghan orphan they brought home in defiance of a U.S. government decision to reunite her with her Afghan family. The decision most likely ends a bitter, yearslong legal battle over the girl’s fate.

In 2020, a judge in Fluvanna County, Virginia, granted Joshua and Stephanie Mast an adoption of the child, who was then 7,000 miles away in Afghanistan living with a family the Afghan government decided were her relatives.

Four justices on the Virginia Supreme Court on Thursday signed onto an opinion reversing two lower courts’ rulings that found the adoption was so flawed it was void from the moment it was issued.

The justices wrote that a Virginia law that cements adoption orders after six months bars the child’s Afghan relatives from challenging the court, no matter how flawed its orders and even if the adoption was obtained by fraud.

Three justices issued a scathing dissent, calling what happened in this court “wrong,” “cancerous” and “like a house built on a rotten foundation.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How can a Fluvanna County judge decide the adoption of a citizen of another country, who is 7,000 miles away? That seems clearly like the wrong court.

[-] nuxi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Worse, an adoption that was conducted in violation of the laws of war.

The Marine committed a war crime and he should be court martialed. The judges who ruled in his favor are accessories to a war crime. As per the supremacy clausr, the Geneva Convention supercedes state law.

"Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive."

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This is also my question. She is essentially on the other side of the world. Deciding whether her adoption is legal sounds like an issue for the local Afghan courts, not the Virginia court system in any way.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3876 readers
177 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS