57
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
820 readers
14 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net). Research carried out in the UK that affects the UK as well as elsewhere is acceptable.
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our current banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm all for this, but how on Earth does a simple bridge cost £460 million? Just putting that in the headline feels like rage bait.
According to this, the entire road project is costing £500 million, so I doubt that this figure is for the bridge alone.
That makes more sense. Seems like a terrible headline from the Mirror, and probably entirely on purpose at that...
This post should be taken down if the article is misinformation.
oof. I thought, someone must be embezzling
That sounds crazy expensive, like everything related to car infrastructure. The width of the bridge and big number of lanes to cross probably increases cost as well.
The solution isn't to give up on wildlife crossing, it's to reduce the number of lanes of course.
you right, it will actually cost 800-900 million probably