1
submitted 4 days ago by tatoko556@reddthat.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ca

https://imgbox.com/qlaBvJVW


The moderators of lemmy.ml show an unwillingness to accept rational discussion and demonstrate a flawed understanding of mutual respect.

Discussion continues here


Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

Do you agree? If not, what is your counterargument?

Edit:

Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.

From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net

Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.

From @artyom@piefed.social

https://gizmodo.com/reddit-meta-and-google-voluntarily-gave-dhs-info-of-anti-ice-users-report-says-2000722279

However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago
[-] tatoko556@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

you can't have a meaningful discussion without logical response

[-] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

you can't have a meaningful discussion at all

[-] tatoko556@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Are you trying to say "Okay lackey." is meaningful or justify or invalidates the idea that “surveillance of the public is acceptable” in countries like Russia, China, and India. is meaningless?

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

privacy

8705 readers
1 users here now

Big tech and governments are monitoring and recording your eating activities. c/Privacy provides tips and tricks to protect your privacy against global surveillance.

Partners:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS