339
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

A backup system that isn’t tested regularly is not a backup at all, just the illusion of one.

If you can’t turn the power off with 24h notice then nature will turn it off with zero notice at the most inconvenient moment.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I do not follow the logic of people being so blinded by their love of cats that they literally think they can become electrical grid engineers and know all the risks, just because they want to know them.

It does not matter if every single vulnerable building has backups and tested them yesterday (obviously none of that could ever be close to true), it's still a non-zero risk to human lives, for one cat.

[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago

The cat isn’t part of the equation, I gave no opinion on that. The risk of never testing your failure response is much higher than the risk of testing your failure response.

If a test happens to save a cat? Lucky cat. If not, they’ll still have to test it at some other point anyway.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I never remotely commented that backup systems shouldn't be tested. Bizarre.

[-] Robin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They should indeed do regular tests of their backups. They should also ensure technical staff is on-site during those tests.

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
339 points (100.0% liked)

cats

28525 readers
502 users here now

Typical internet cats. Videos, pics, memes, and discussion welcome!

Rule 1) Be kind

Rule 2) Follow the lemmy.world rules

other cat communities

midwest.social cats

cats with jobs

birds, some cats

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS