view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
[1] They were also supposed to leave people alone who were only charged with crimes - let the legal system (creaky as it is) decide guilt or innocence first, have the guilty serve their time, and then deport them.
[2] They were supposed to be targeting only those with felony convictions, not someone who bounced a check forty years ago.
All of this chaos is at least partially driven by the quotas the regime has imposed on ICE. I mean, if an immigrant is a murderer who has successfully hidden from ICE for a couple decades, they're not going to be easy to find, and ICE will find one or two of them a week.
You know who is easy to find? People checking into their flights at the airport. People turning up for their mandatory immigration status meeting. People showing up for court dates. People going to work in a sector with a lot of immigrants. Etc.
And the thing is, the people in charge knew this would happen, they expected and encouraged it to happen, they wanted it to happen this way. But by putting in quotas, it allows them distance and deniability from the actual implementation and chaos that ensues. They can go on Faux and say both, "We're going after these people with everything we have" and "Well, there was a misunderstanding about [what | how] they were supposed to do things on the ground".