977
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
977 points (100.0% liked)
News
36063 readers
2913 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
At the time you made this comment he'd called in the MN guard... a day before.
Currently the guard is feeding protesters so IDK man, that's actually pretty big.
No, it's not lol, it's completely inconsequential. They didn't protect the protestor whose hand was blown off by ICE's use of "less lethal" munitions this morning. I don't give a fuck if they pass out donuts and do some PR segments, there's no evidence to suggest they're meaningfully on our side... yet. Especially after state police brutalized protestors at the site of Alex's murder.
I'm eager to be wrong. I think it's a vital turning point so I very, very, very much hope to be wrong. But I don't see it yet.
Serious question, what would demonstrate they're meaningfully on our side to you, but wouldn't be a literal civil war? Because short of that, federal troops feeding protesters is a big deal.
Some places to start could be
I think those would all fall short of "a literal civil war".
I see federal troops feeding protestors as an attempt to maintain the perception of the state as a legitimate authority without actually needing to take any meaningful action. "Look guys, they're with us!"... except when the bullets / less-than-lethal projectiles start flying.
Is a great thing, I hope they do this (though if they do follow through I suspect trump will order them to stop)
Would unfortunately be a civil war thing - it's not open conflict, but it would require the subversion of federal systems (the emergency warning systems) to actively sabotage federal troops. I don't know about the free speech rights, but generally speaking the military has sharp restrictions on what counts as free speech.
He was killed two days ago and the court hearing to attempt to ensure BCA has access to the site is ongoing as I write this so hopefully there will be progress soon!
Another serious question (and setting aside the question of legality because who fuckin' cares at this point), what resources should the state put out to support this? Having worked with several state governments, there's not really "spare cash" floating around to enable this kind of unbelievable expenditure, so it's somewhat limited to an eviction freeze (which is almost entirely out of the state's control)
Not really a national guard thing but fair enough. I've seen some limited vids from there but most of what I've seen was one violent interaction then the police fled, was there more than that? I've seen people say they came back that evening but I can't find a good source for that.
I too see 1. as the unambiguous thing to do, follow ICE, record everything. Be a visible deterrent. I don't think Trump has the right to order them to stop and I don't think they are inclined to listen to Trump over the interests of their own community.
Though being around the question is what is the guard response to an event like the Pretti shooting would be if they were there documenting things... Being in that scenario with guardsmen might be impossible to both avoid conflict and provide an acceptable response. Guess we would have to hope that the inherent risk of escalation tempers the ICE people, but they haven't exactly shown themselves to have that sort of restraint...
Unfortunately the national guard was federalized, so Trump is their direct commander and has every right to order them to stop doing things like recording other groups. I think the hope is that the Guard presence would outright prevent another execution, I don't know how accurate that hope is but it's a far better option than we have right now.