651
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The biblical jesus didn't exist. There's evidence that a Jesus existed, and was notable enough to piss off the Roman administration.

A lot of the biblical stories are older than jesus however, so he has a lot of existing "lore" tacked on to him. He was likely a nomadic wise/holy man who built up a bit of a following and was then crucified.

[-] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

there’s one mention of a jesus that fits, in roman records. one time, one person, wrote a name down.
could that be a real person or maybe a story about a person?
not just biblical stories predated jesus, but the entire story is exactly the same as Zoroaster.
from the exact same region, exact same people, “first recorded in the mid-6th century BCE”.
some people just made a reboot of Zoroastrianism… probably the romans, on purpose, to make their combo-religion to govern all romans (catholicism)
jesus did not exist at all

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
651 points (100.0% liked)

Eh Buddy Hoser

959 readers
1 users here now

Shitposting from Canada / Turtle Island.

Take off ya hoser!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS