365

Donald Trump has said he might block ExxonMobil from investing in Venezuela after the oil company’s chief executive called the country “uninvestable” during a White House meeting last week.

Darren Woods told the US president that Venezuela would need to change its laws before it could be an attractive investment opportunity, during the high-profile meeting on Friday with at least 17 other oil executives.

Woods’ sceptical remarks quickly emerged as the dominant headline, undercutting the White House’s hopes of building momentum from its engagement with the world’s most prominent oil executives.

"I didn’t like Exxon’s response,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One on his way back to Washington on Sunday. “I’ll probably be inclined to keep Exxon out. I didn’t like their response. They’re playing too cute.”

Exxon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 182 points 1 month ago

"I'm not showing up to your party."

"Well fuck you, I'm not inviting you then!"

OK?

Seriously, Americans, how the fuck did this guy win two elections? Please make it make sense.

[-] scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago

If you are brave enough watch fox news and it might explain why. The facts run scared, the conspiracy theories are king, and hate grows on trees.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Grandma and grandpa didn’t die fast enough.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Bullshit, Trump won the young votes too.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago
[-] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

Thanks Joe Rogan!

[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It was the young vote that did it sadly.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, and I'm so tired of hearing people blame every political illness on the older generations.
In the 70's we had peace movements and protests to make a better world like nothing you see today.
As I see it, it's the young generations that are failing today. There is no idealism, no goals for a better future that they fight for.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 1 month ago

The R/D split is only like 53/47 for the baby boomers. It's not like they're a solid red demographic.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago

He's basically an amalgamation of all the worst qualities of the average American. He represents more Americans than he doesn't. This is something we Americans need to come to terms with since a lot of us are in denial about that.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

yup, it really shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone truly familiar with america as a whole, anyone not stuck in a bubble.

dumb as shit and the only reason for relevance is his daddy's name, yet completely convinced of his own superiority. that shit is about as universal as it gets in america. and it's the perfect setup to run a puppet government

the extra funny/sad part is that all it would take for dems or anyone else to beat em is just...be authentic, for once in their miserable lives. that's literally all it takes, but these coastal elites who have been trained their whole lives to be career politicians are completely incapable of that because they're barely human anymore.

had kamala stuck to her "free universal healthcare" shtick instead of flip-flopping immediately once her campaign advisors told her that was polling bad with their donors, she would have won.

americans were promised "hope and change" by Obama and all they got was more corporate kickbacks and pointless wars, establishment politicians seem convinced things can still "return to normal" (ie. unsustainable ratfucking) when trump is gone which is why they're doing the absolute minimum to stop him and co. now

personally...i think shit goes from bad to much worse when/if he croaks mid term.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

She didn't really flip flop. She had a working plan to take steps toward universal healthcare/Medicare for all that acknowledged the political realities of instituting such a system with republican pushback, but the Dems genuinely do suck ass at messaging so that got lost in the sauce. Her platform never really shifted throughout the campaign, just the PR. Which yeah was a bad move but the fix was already in anyway.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

You are pretending you do not know how politics is played, and excusing the dems refusal to play it, to be popular, to offer reform.

To LEAD the party. If 2024 did not wake you up nothing will. You will forever be a de facto tool of the rw preventing a party that can unseat these republicans.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Scratch a both sideser, find ruspublican agitprop. Every time.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Us military bootlicker.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well said. The establishment learned nothing.

Maybe the mold will be broken I suspect false vote rigging indictments coming on dems fall 2027 in the lead up to the presidential election.

Might be able to retake it in the succession fight, but not with newsome running as status quo. Even if they did squeak a win past r cheating, denial, they would do nothing with it, be unpopular, hand it right back.

As if keeping things from getting as bad was acceptable, we need a New Deal.

Either we give it to them, or fake populist fascists will.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i do allow myself a smidge of optimism, with mamdani winning NYC's mayoral election.

if an open and honest socialist can win major seat in the most crooked/establishment heart of america, then progressives can win any seat in the country.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Not just progressive, we need reform candidates of all types, to fit their districts, cooperating in agreement on working people not getting screwed by the rich without consent.

And a citizenry organized on our own forums, maybe a Federated thing, where we can cooperate know what we agree on and organize into public and private groups to that effect, finding and grooming candidates that are not sold out cunts being one of those things we agree

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i mean...there is no center in the US, all reform is "left" at this point i think. anyone running on a platform of "i want to actually spend your $ on something useful, instead of ratfucking it" is progressive in the US, that's how far the overton window has shifted to the right

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

The sentiment is widespread amongst conservatives as well however. We actually agree on a lot with a lot of of these people. And out and out Progressive will not be able to win rural Nebraska or whatever, but a different flavor of reformer could. And we could all agree but the rich should not be allowed to take our hard-earned freedoms and lower our quality of life, or dump their toxic byproducts in the ditch and poison us all. The rich captured both conservative and liberal parties.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mamdami is absolutely a template for how progressives can win nation wide. But the key is to treat it is as a toolkit, not something to be copy-and-pasted exactly. Mamdami wouldn't win in, say, Idaho, but there are people who can. They just have to keep hammering on the shit that matters to the average voter.

Biden and Kamala sank because they promised to keep doing exactly the same shit they'd been doing for the last four years, while refusing to acknowledge how much worse the average person's quality of life had gotten over the last four years. Mamdami won because he focused, hard on cost of living issues. Make that your core message and people will flock to you. Healthcare and groceries. That's what it's all about right now.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 1 month ago

these coastal elites who have been trained their whole lives to be career politicians are completely incapable of that because they're barely human anymore.

Do they also have ivory towers?

81% of the population lives in coastal states. Are you saying inland politicians are more authentic? Or are you playing the classic Republican spiel that them city folk are the cause of all the problems? Because I haven't seen any evidence to back either claim.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The President isn't elected in a popular vote, and small states in the middle of the county have vastly more relative voting power than states on the coasts? It isn't that inland politicians are more authentic. It is that inland voters, who have double the voting power, choose to vote for people who ACT like salt of the earth, whether they are from a long-wealthy family or not. So if you act like a coastal elite, you are at a disadvantage compared to someone who acts like a cowboy even though they went to Yale. Or if you talk like a normal person and use complete sentences, you are at a disadvantage to someone who yells and screams about being a Christian even though they aren't.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 2 points 1 month ago

So they believe one act and not the other, despite the behavior (and votes in congress) to the contrary. So we're back to lack of education being the problem, unless you're a conservative, in which case it's a benefit.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty much, yeah. Millions of Americans still think the guy who would be cool in high school is a better leader than the biggest nerd in school. They vote for the guy they want to have a beer with.

Also, millions of Americans care more about saving their money in taxes over hurting other people.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I had that conversation. Someone would rather pay more for healthcare than have someone who doesn't 'deserve' it have access.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

...the US doesn't have proportional representation for presidential elections, nor for the House in most states considering how gerrymandered everyt is, so it doesn't matter where most of the people live.

until it does, how rural america sees you is all that matters. you want to win battleground states, you have to atleast be able to pretend to be an actual person.

doesn't matter what your positions are, becaude most US voters are just selfish anyway, be a complete piece of shit long as you come off as a "real" piece of shit.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago
[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Behold, the American in denial. I bet you vote third party too.

[-] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

It's really surprising and disappointing how many of my countrymen are assholes.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think 1/3 of the population counts as the average.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The only viable opposition party is deeply corrupt and doesn't know how to campaign anymore

[-] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 10 points 1 month ago

Americans, how the fuck did this guy win two elections?

This guy is the quintessential american. If you take the average of all United States residents, this is exactly what pops out. Its not surprising at all.

[-] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Well, no

You just have to scrape the grease traps of the southern states, and roll that average american together. Most Americans hate these turds

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

dumb as shit, completely convinced of his own superiority, and his only reason for relevance is his family name. that shit is relatable as fuck to rich/poor alike.

sprinkle in a bit of racism, an incredibly under-educated population, and an extensive propaganda machine and it should be no surprise he wins...mostly just from coming off as "authentic".

his polling was worse when he read from scripts, him going off script on completely batshit insane tangents made him "real" instead of just another career ratfuck politician

and of course the real kicker...most americans are short-sighted and greedy as fuck (which also makes trump relatable) and will just vote for whoever promises them the most $

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

This is how much enough Americans don’t trust women in leadership roles. They’ll make all sorts of excuses to explain it away, but at the heart, they just don’t like women.

[-] rainbowbunny@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Propaganda is powerful

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
365 points (100.0% liked)

News

36043 readers
2920 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS