1091
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

“Fcking bitch,” Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent who killed Renee Good, says in the video.*

A newly released cellphone video, apparently filmed by the ICE officer who killed Renee Nicole Good, and obtained by Minneapolis-based Alpha News, a conservative-leaning nonprofit news site, appears to sharply contradict the U.S. government’s public account of the fatal Wednesday shooting, raising new questions about whether the agent who opened fire was ever in immediate danger.

The footage was recorded on a cellphone by ICE officer Jonathan Ross, not by a department body camera. It captures Ross’s own perspective as he approaches Good’s maroon Honda Pilot during what the Department of Homeland Security claims was a federal operation in south Minneapolis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Interesting. Do you think he knew immediately he had killed her? He seemed to call her a bitch(if it was him speaking) as she was driving off, before she hit the parked cars. Also, did the wife outside the car yell "drive, baby, drive" because she was afraid? The guy who shot her was walking around the car, but he didn't draw his gun until he got in front and she started to hit the gas. They all had clear police markings on their uniforms, but what was the correct response from her in that situation(genuine question)?

[-] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Interesting, the video shows her backing up and then cutting the wheel HARD RIGHT, AWAY from the agent who EASILY SIDESTEPPED, and that is when he shot her point blank in the face with at least 2 rounds, and watched her slump over the wheel as the car accelerated straight into a post, all while spitting out "fuckin' bitch" like he just fucking SHOWED HER.

It's disgusting to see how many sociopaths like you exist in this world.

[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I agree there are a lot of sociopaths out there, but do you know what that word means? I'm asking some questions to get more people's viewpoints on this because clearly a bunch of people don't see it the way I do, which is confusing to me. Does that reaaaally make me a sociopath?

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 2 points 2 months ago

I would say yes, yes it does make you a sociopath by asking such questions in this thread that shows a woman being murdered from the perspective of the murderer.

You clearly lack the empathy and wherewithal to understand the nuance happening here, that anyone with empathy can see.

[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I suppose, yet again, if I(and textbooks) don't agree with your definitions of empathy and sociopath, I'm in the wrong by default, but then, I guess you're arguing "empathy" over logic, so it really shouldn't be surprising. Thank you for helping me to understand your point of view, even if you don't want to have a discussion.

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oh, I'm quite logical but read the room. This is not the time or place to pose those questions that you're asking and you won't get a logical answer for the most part.

I'm just noticing you attempting to make your point everywhere near the top of the thread and you're getting confused as to why most people aren't engaging with your rhetoric. I'm not mad at you, dude.

[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Yep, I really don't like it, but it's not as clear cut as people think it is. Let the courts go through all the evidence and have them assess it.

[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I agree and that's probably exactly what's going to happen. I'm honestly, genuinely just confused how half of the nation sees one thing and the other half sees the exact opposite in the same exact clips. Both halves would be willing to die on that hill(and a civil war would do exactly that). Is it mass manipulation or is half the nation just lying? The whole scenario is just unreal and no one seems to know(or care) exactly why.

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Same shit happens every time anything like this happens. During the occupy wall street stuff, a video came out of a cop bumping into a protester with his motorcycle. Obviously an aggressive and unwarranted move, but it was barely a nudge, and the protester collapsed in a heap screaming like a slasher movie bimbo. It was so obviously a dive. But still, anyone on the left had to scream police brutality and speculate on the severity of the protester's injuries, while anyone who pointed out that it wasn't that bad was labeled as a bootlicker, and "defending the cops". Same shit, just the roles are reversed from time to time.

[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I absolutely agree.

[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

Yep it's scary. Especially when you look into research on extremist group tactics on social media... they divide and conquer, spread dissent, and manipulate all sorts. It honestly scares me

[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

The FBI will find no wrongdoing, no there won’t even be a court to go through it.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

He drew the gun before walking in front of the car. Why are you lying? What else do you lie about?

[-] Ecc911@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Idk I guess my eyes have an AI filter on them. Can't seem to see his hand doing the physical motion of drawing the gun until after he's standing in front of the car. Crazy. They also just released another angle showing she definitely tried to block traffic and sat there honking for a while before she was approached, so your arguments aren't aging very well. No worries tho. I unsubscribed from the news part of Lemmy. You can have it 😁

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
1091 points (100.0% liked)

News

36534 readers
2015 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS