897
submitted 3 months ago by hamid@crazypeople.online to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masterflappie@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago

Private property and freedom of association are core aspects of capitalism, colonialism did none of those things. Capitalism didn't arrive in the colonies until the colonists left.

[-] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Slaves were considered private property in the USAmerica, right?
Was USAmerica a colony during their civil war?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

The US Empire is still a settler-colony, to be clear.

[-] masterflappie@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago

Private property alone doesn't make capitalism, by that logic the ancient civilzations of egypt and sumer would already be capitalist. Capitalism is a collection of ideas, from the right to own private property to freedom of association, none of which is compatible with slavery.

Which is a big reason why the capitalist countries were the first to outlaw slavery.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Capitalism is a mode of production built on private ownership as the principle aspect of the economy. You're confusing the values espoused by liberals with the actual system itself as it exists in the real world, and as such are trying to pretend the same system that created the triangle trade is somehow anti-slavery. Capitalism caused and accelerated the slave trade when the colonizers needed agrarian labor for the land they were settling after genociding the natives.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're confusing values espoused by liberalism with the consequences of economies dominated by private property. Colonialism was driven by capitalism, and justified by liberalism. Further, I am talking about ongoing imperialism, not just colonialism.

[-] masterflappie@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago

just what exactly is liberal about invading foreign countries and submitting them to production quota's at the threat of death?

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

The free movement of capital and the pursuit of profits is the purpose of liberalism, including the devastating impacts on the working classes that come from that. Liberalism is the justification for capitalism, not capitalism itself, and the necessary consequences of capitalist plunder is intrinsic to capitalism.

I recommend reading Domenico Losurdo's Liberalism - A Counter History.

[-] masterflappie@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago

Liberalism is the ideology of advocating for liberty.

Invading foreign coutnries and submitting them to production quota's at the threat of death is not liberty.

I recommend reading a dictionary https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/liberalism

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

I'm well aware of the history of liberalism and how its apologists try to hide its use to justify colonialism, imperialism, crushing worker movements, etc. I've read the dictionary definitions. You aren't changing the way liberalism functions in real life, just trying to avoid complicity in the damage its caused by trying to paint a better picture of it.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
897 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

55616 readers
588 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS