3
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
Humans
2 readers
1 users here now
This is a community for anyone interested in anthropology, archeology, and history.
Feel free to post thought-provoking material related to the categories above.
Rules:
- No memes
- Images are only allowed if you provide context
- No posting your own material
- Modern-day politics is banned
Rules are subject to change, especially in the beginning. You're welcome to start a discussion about them.
Other communities
- Architecture →
[!architecture@terefere.eu](/c/architecture@terefere.eu) - Art →
[!art@terefere.eu](/c/art@terefere.eu) - Artefacts →
[!artefacts@terefere.eu](/c/artefacts@terefere.eu) - Design →
[!design@terefere.eu](/c/design@terefere.eu) - Photography →
[!photography@terefere.eu](/c/photography@terefere.eu)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I know little about this, but is scanning human muscle tissue then mapping it onto the skeleton of Lucy the best way to determine how her muscles worked ? How do we know she even had muscles similar to our own ? Sure her bones are similar but does that indicate she was like us in her muscles as well?
The paper touches on this in its introduction. I can't explain how they did it, because the details are too technical for me.
However, the method they used comes from this paper here, where they reconstructed an extinct archosaur's legs by using an extant crocodile species. If I understood it correctly, they were able to verify the technique by then applying it to a gorilla's shoulder.
Ahh, I should have read more thoroughly. I just skimmed it. Thanks for the info I'll read up on this.