A saner organization would also hit up submitters for a reviewer's fee. This would reduce AI spam. Barriers to entry matter.

A reviewers fee is equivalent to Canonical offering customer support contracts. Obviously a person that needs to lean on AI as a crutch, is just screaming out for reviewers to act as advisers. The reviewer just wielding the giant DENIED stamp is fun, but doesn't address the issue of noobs implicitly asking to work with a consultant.

gnome reviewers obviously never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.