727

The six-year-old student who shot his teacher in the US earlier this year, boasted about the incident saying "I shot [her] dead", unsealed court documents show.

While being restrained after the shooting at a Virginia school, the boy is said to have admitted "I did it", adding "I got my mom's gun last night".

His teacher, Abigail "Abby" Zwerner - who survived - filed a $40m (£31.4m) lawsuit earlier this year.

The boy has not been charged.

The boy's mother, however, Deja Taylor, has been charged with felony child neglect and misdemeanour recklessly leaving a loaded firearm as to endanger a child.

In Ms Zwerner's lawsuit, filed in April, she accuses school officials of gross negligence for ignoring warning signs and argues the defendants knew the child "had a history of random violence

The documents also mention another incident with the same student while he was in kindergarten. A retired teacher told police he started "choking her to the point she could not breathe".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Falmarri@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

How would safe storage laws prevent this? They would just result in another charge for the mother. You really think someone who leaves a gun around with a 6 year old with behavioral issues would lock it up just because of a law?

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Storage laws are the easiest to abide by, though. My stuff all lives in a safe, which key is on my person, because my dotty wife and ditzy daughter frequently forget to lock the door behind them.

Is an intruder just gonna take the safe and lockboxes? Yep.

Am I gonna report that theft as "lockbox, contained one pistol (SN:xxxxxxxx); loaded magazine, 9 rounds?" You betcha.

As you say, LPL videos are free so a lockbox and safe are like, the least obstructive Imlediments ever. What's the harm in this Pascal's wager?

Edit: bah! Wrong reply bug! This was directed to a comment down thread 👇

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Bingo they're just a barrier to entry that negatively effects those of lower income since safes aren't cheap. Start a program to provide secure no cost safes upon request and I'm with you.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Trigger locks aren't secure storage and moreover they're not $10 every local sheriff's office I'm aware of will provide a trigger lock or cable lock at no charge no questions asked.

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Lockpickinglawyer youtube videos are free.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

Nobody on the internet can mention safe storage of firearms without an apologists for people who keep guns in a drawer turning up and saying "Lockpickinglawyer".

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Lol apologist? Are you kidding me right now?

Sorry most gun locks aren't what they're marketed as. If all I need to beat a lock is a slip of plastic from a 2 litter your lock is not secure.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

LockPickingLawyer is extremely good at picking and bypassing locks. Most children and opportunistic criminals are not.

His channel also showcases the worst locks he can find, because that's where the views are. In countries with gun laws that actually work, they often have approved safes and locks specifically to ensure they meet a reasonable standard of security.

Millions of Americans keep loaded guns in drawers, glove compartments, closets and naff hidden compartments. The pro-gun community generally turns a blind eye to this and staunchly oppose measures to ensure "responsible gun owners" are actually being responsible.

And the excuse that always pops up eventually is "LockpickingLawyer proves that trying to secure guns with more than threats of domestic violence is a waste of time".

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Who taught the 6 year old to load, cock and use a gun? I'm guessing the sob mother won't fess up to it. Maybe kids are smarter than we think?

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Surely the 6 year old in question will just eBay a set of sparrow picks and practice tumblers

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is just poor logic. Guns themselves cost money, which negatively effects those one lower incomes. Should we provide free guns to anyone that wants one too?

And you know what else negatively effects those on low incomes? Being shot.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not at all. Guns are often inherited and transferred without fee. And yes in my opinion if you pass a free series of tests on gun ownership/responsibility/safety then yeah, as a militaristic country invasion is almost certainty sooner or later. Should we be militaristic? Probably not but we adjust for the conditions as they are not as we wish them to be.

Correct, systemic issues including fun fact gun control attempts make lower income areas higher crime and thus higher gun crime. Weird huh?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Correct, systemic issues including fun fact gun control attempts make lower income areas higher crime and thus higher gun crime. Weird huh?

Are you having a stroke? None of this makes any sort of sense.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's plain English boss, reading comprehension is your part to provide.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Lmao, whatever you say buddy.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's potentially missing one comma, it's still quite legible but again understanding it is up to you.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Some states require a trigger lock to be sold along with the weapon. Not as good as a safe but it should prevent accidental discharge. That being said I would support a program to provide no-cost lock boxes (not giant safes) for handguns.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

How would safe storage laws prevent this? They would just result in another charge for the mother. You really think someone who leaves a gun around with a 6 year old with behavioral issues would lock it up just because of a law?

The implication is that you actually enforce the laws after you implement them, rather than just implementing them as a way to add a charge. For example in my country police will come to inspect my house at least once a year to make sure im storing them properly and if a neighbour complains or something they will also make an unschedules checked.

I get American gun owners would take this basic safety precaution as the deepest violation of a tyranical government and would shoot a cop before they let them inspect their home for safety, but my point is if they did agree to sensible safe storage legislation this wouldnt have happened

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This shit happens literally every day in the US. At this point, it’s like getting worked up about the wind blowing. They’re a lost cause.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Jesus Christ dude.

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
727 points (100.0% liked)

News

37724 readers
2814 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS