103
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Babalugats@feddit.uk to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world

I hear his long-term plan includes racing Usain Bolt when he's 75 and Paul is 64.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 11 points 2 days ago

trying to prove that he setup, paid and that the fights were mostly scripted

There's nothing scripted about the fights. He just only fights people he knows he can handily beat because of his size and youth. I don't like Paul, but the whole "the fights are fixed" narrative is silly (and entirely devoid of evidence). He's a hack who only fights people who are ancient, retired, or not even fighters to begin with like basketball player Nate Robinson. He doesn't have to fix these fights; they're just that overwhelmingly booked in his favor.

Also, this entire topic gives him exactly what he wants: attention for his rage-baiting clout-chasing career.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago
[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago

In what way? You mean the way Paul didn't completely massacre him in round 1 even though he could've? That's how exhibitions work. Paul was showing restraint because they wanted to put on a show. Tyson had zero chance of winning that fight so Paul carried him for a few rounds. That isn't a "fixed" fight. "Fixed" means the outcome was agreed upon before the fight, but that isn't what happened.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago
[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You might've seen one too many movies if you think Tyson was going to win that fight. Vegas odds were Paul +249 to Tyson -190.

"I do not like Jake Paul and therefore Jake Paul could not have won the fight legitimately" isn't evidence that the fight was fixed. Paul was fighting a man 31 years his senior and several inches shorter. It's not rocket science. Everyone (including me) wanted Tyson to knock Paul out, but this isn't Hollywood.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

You keep telling yourself that. Tyson barely threw a punch.

Kid yourself all you want, but don't try and contaminate the rest of the world with your nonsense.

Tyson reportedly interested in Turki Alalshikh's offer, never got a reply from Jake Paul.

[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 day ago

Tyson barely threw a punch because he's ancient and knew Paul could counterpunch much faster than Tyson could react. Tyson knew he was fighting an uphill battle and chose to be very conservative with his approach. Which was a smart idea. He didn't want to get knocked out like Tyron Woodley did.

Do you actually follow combat sports at all, or do you only show up when a YouTuber is on the fight card? If the latter, I could understand why you might think the way you do. If you actually follow combat sports or have any understanding of how they work, it's obvious that the fight didn't need to be fixed. There's a reason 58-year-old boxers don't fight 27-year-old boxers. It's boring and one-sided.

Again, "I do not like Jake Paul" is not actual evidence that the fight was fixed. Please feel free to provide any actual evidence you might have supporting your position, though.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿคก

You're only saving grace is that you obviously don't know what you're talking about.

[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago

And yet you refuted no part of my argument and did nothing to lend credence to your own ๐Ÿค”

The ignorant party here is you. But by all means continue laboring under the delusion that you understand boxing because you watched the highlights of one YouTuber fighting a geriatric in an exhibition.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What or why would I refute anything you say? It's obvious that you don't really understand boxing, it's level of corruption and how that exhibition was played out. You have already staggered with attempts to put words in my mouth/text twice that I didn't mention anything even close to. I have no interest in going any further with somebody showing and starting with those traits.

As I said, you continue thinking what you like, but don't contaminate other people's thoughts with your nonsense.

[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 1 points 1 day ago

Professional boxing is corrupt in many, many ways. I never said otherwise.

That said, boxing being corrupt isn't the reason that Tyson lost to Paul. Tyson lost to Paul because Tyson was 58 years old. Again, not rocket science. This was an exhibition. The corruption you speak of is more prevalent in the actual professional circuit, not fights between youtubers and influencers.

And perhaps take your own advice about not "contaminating other people's thoughts" with your unsubstantiated nonsense. Tyson took the fight because the purse was enormous even if he lost, just like everyone who agrees to fight Paul. No one who actually watches boxing was surprised when Paul won.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 1 points 21 hours ago

Again. For the final time. You. Don't. Understand. What. You. Are. Talking. About.

That's a good thing. You can learn later on.

[-] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 1 points 19 hours ago

๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿ˜…๐Ÿคก

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
103 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

43008 readers
607 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS