692
We did (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Serious question even though I know if the answer isn't "no one" it just sound stupid or loaded to people from these cultural circles:

Who twists the history in a way to light voting rights for women as some kind of male achievement? Oo

I mean I've heard of individual men being supportive but that word already implies them not being the drivers.

I'm genuinely curious because with no exposure to that framing the post reads like ragebaiting - but it also might be justified rage I just wasn't exposed to so far, if you get my drift.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

It's being referred to as a privilege that can be taken away. There has been discussion among the ultra right in the last four years of making the male head of household the only one with voting rights.

This law is being pushed to "protect the integrity of votes" by only letting people vote if their name matches their birth certificate, which would put up a barrier to climb over for married women who have changed their last name and trans people whose names don't match their birth certificate and people who don't have access to or the money to get a copy of their birth certificate.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/they-re-coming-after-women-s-suffrage-republicans-reintroduce-save-act-to-create-voting-barriers-for-married-women/ar-AA1yPLkD

The Pentagon says Pete Hegseth supports women's right to vote, even though he reposts videos of church leaders saying they should not vote.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/15/politics/pentagon-hegseth-womens-right-to-vote

[-] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

Oh my fucking god. Like ... I knew that the US politics were derailed/deranged but. Wait, I'm actually surprised that I'm surprised by this. It's ... Consistent.

Thanks for this anyway, today I learned something - although the thing itself is shitty the learning isn't ๐Ÿ’œ

[-] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I'm a divorced cisgender woman who legally changed my name to something that is neither my maiden name nor my married name and got a new birth certificate to back it up. I wonder if I'd get around their stupid rules or if they'd just drag me out back and execute me.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Depends on your state of fertility. You may be given a red dress and assigned to a new house. Blessed be the fruit.

[-] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Thankfully I found a doctor who permanently took care of that problem forever :) I am one of the conservatives' nightmares: a divorced 30-something single cat lady who can't have babies, lives alone, and works a fuck ton of hours to pay all my own bills. I'm also useless as a housewife and I curse a fuckton. Meek tradwife/breeding material I am not.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

The political right in the US is doing that.

Often that's conflated into meaning just men in general tho

[-] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 8 points 2 days ago

Men like Trump, who want to get credit for all the things that people supporting him consider good, and deflect blame for all the crappy things he's actually responsible for (or that any respectable leader would take responsibility for because they are the leader, regardless of if they actually were behind it).

[-] Klear@quokk.au 3 points 2 days ago

Oh shit, did he go as far as to claim he was personally responsible? Wouldn't surprise me.

[-] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

It would be hilarious if Trump claimed to be personally responsible for women voting rights though. Terrifying but also funny!

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
692 points (100.0% liked)

Witches VS Patriarchy

1129 readers
698 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS