795
me_irl (feddit.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 6 points 6 months ago

"Bloodmouth" is clearly trying to be a slur (although it's the first time I see the term). "Carnist" however is just a neologism with meaning "someone who eats meat as part of their alimentation".

Words exist to convey meaning, that's all. Now vegans or vegetarians can be aggressive towards carnists, that's for sure. Nothing to do with vocabulary.

Vocabulary has a lot to do with it, no one wants to be called a slur and they use carnist as a slur

[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

Then what word would you like people to use for "person eating meat as part of their alimentation"? I ask in good faith, I'm really curious to know your opinion.

I don't think that "meat-eater" is necessarily better than "carnist" ๐Ÿ˜• Or a negative like "non-vegeterian"? A bit of a mouthful.

[-] sucius@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago
[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 3 points 6 months ago

Alright, that's pretty good. I wanna nitpick by saying that vegetarians are also omnivorous because omnivorous is digesting "plant and animal matter", but I don't know if it would be in good faith :p Thanks for the discussion.

[-] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's not up to me to support bigotry. Sort it out amongst yourselves like adults

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 5 points 5 months ago

Ugh I hate this attitude. People that say "words are just words" have never had a slur yelled inches from their face.

If words are just words, then what is hate speech?

[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 5 points 5 months ago

I don't deny the existence of slurs or hate speech (like "bloodmouth"). In this particular case, "carnist" is an academic word used in scientific papers in a sociological context.

Like I said in the other thread, it's describing the opposite of vegetarianism and veganism. "Omnivorous" was proposed as an alternative, but it's initially understood as "digesting plant and animal matter" in zoology, which would technically include vegetarians.

There is a need for a name that excludes vegans and vegetarians to describe reality.

Sorry for the Godwin point, but fascism is also an academic word used to describe a real political movement and fascists hate being called fascists. I'm myself eating meat so I don't want to draw parallels here.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

"Carnist" however is just a neologism with meaning "someone who eats meat as part of their alimentation".

that is not what it means

[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago

Okay I had a look and, you're right. Apparently it's an academic word in sociology meaning "prevailing ideology in which people support the use and consumption of animal products, especially meat." So it's not the practice, it's the way of thinking.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
795 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

7740 readers
632 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS