1390
stop driving (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

Okay done. Now that I have eliminated this here my contribution to CO2 emissions, what do we do about the 100 companies that cause 70% of global CO2 emissions? Or is that no longer an issue once my car is taken out of circulation?

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 34 points 1 year ago

Transportation is a quarter of global emissions, with passenger vehicles making up half of that number and is only getting larger as more people in the world decide they need a car.

The number you're looking for is 20 companies making up 30% of emissions. They're almost exclusively oil companies, with more than half of them being state owned enterprises. Reduce the need for oil and you reduce the amount they pollute.

So, how do you do that?

Personal vehicles are the most flexible in terms of emissions. Increasing the usability of public transportation has a direct correlation with the number of vehicles on the road. Sure, people out in the middle of nowhere need a vehicle and nobody is looking to take that from them, but you could HALF the number of people in the US with a car if cities had proper public transport or were as walkable as they were barely 80 years ago.

The private sector is more difficult. We'd need to rebuild our train infrastructure that has been gutted and raided by our rail companies in order to get trucks off the interstate. Coincidentally, that would get MORE people off the road since you wouldn't need a car to go between cities.

Additionally, you seem to be under the impression that we're incapable of solving multiple problems at the same time. We can make cars unnecessarily (not GET RID of them) while also cutting emissions in other areas.

Make no mistake, we do need to address other areas, but cars are an easy target that would reduce tons of emissions and increase people's quality of life as well. Cars are a massive waste of space and a huge ongoing drain on taxpayer dollars for very little benefit when you compare it to the alternatives.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I am not saying that we are incapable of solving multiple problems at once, I am saying that we are incapable of solving the main problem.

I was not joking when I said that my car is not a factor. My individual part in this regard is done. But the point remains that by considering the main sources of pollution too "inflexible" to tackle, it seems that we are debating about which colour to best repaint a sinking ship here while being utterly, completely powerless to address the big hole in the hull.

So in conclusion, I'll now pat myself on the back for having done my part while sailing this doomed (but [for some at least] highly profitable) planet to hell in a handbasket.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I am saying that we are incapable of solving the main problem.

Has to be done via government. Government action is how to address many industrial practices.

But also, when you say "70% by industry", that ignores that industry is producing stuff for us. They don't exist without a consumer.

[-] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely right that it has to be legislated by Government and enforced. Pricing in externalities is important, but at the very least they should be accounted for/reported on honestly (and also not over-inflated).

Consumerism is complicated, of course. It is often manufactured, one way or another. From lack of viable or convenient alternatives (eg. public transport / safe walking and bicycle paths), to straight up advertising and social pressures, to incentives or requirements from above (eg. job, laws, etc.).

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we assume that you'll have a car even if they become unnecessary, then sure, you've done all you're willing to do. However there are tens of millions of people that would happily stop driving if it weren't absolutely required to function. They have not finished doing their part. That includes me.

[-] MrOzwaldMan@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

While we're in cycles, the elites are riding in their luxurious car, and flying in their private jets producing all the emissions the world needs.

Yet! We have to deprive ourselves from vehicles, and they be enjoying life.

[-] malaph@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

Private aviation is basically nothing in terms of emissions. Is pretty gross though.

[-] Francisco@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Can you please support your statement with a reference to the source of that data?

[-] malaph@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector

All aviation is 1.9% .. Private would be a vanishingly small amount of that.

[-] Francisco@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That link does not have information on the contribution of private aviation. You are assuming it.

In this BBC article on What's the climate impact of private jets you can read that

"Emissions per kilometre travelled [using an airplane] are known to be significantly worse than any other form of transport.

(...)

Private jets generally produce significantly more emissions per passenger than commercial flights."

[-] malaph@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

Yes the BBC article is correct too. Just because CO2 emissions per km travelled are high doesn't mean they're statistically relevant in terms of total emissions. All aviation at 1.9% is basically not a meaningful amount of CO2 if you need a 50% reduction.

When weighted for KMs travelled a riding lawn mower is probably worse than a private jet by that logic.

[-] Francisco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

1.9% is significant and meaningful, objectively, mathematically and statistically. It might not feel high to you. But that is your feeling.

And I suspect you are assuming that the path, you think uses the best strategy, to reach 50% reduction on emissions is the only available. Reducing emissions of the persons with most emissions is a valid priority, and these high emitters likely include aviation emmlissions.

[-] malaph@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

1.9% for people to go back to crossing the Atlantic on the titanic .. No more air freight. No more sunny vacations for anyone. That's all aviation gone. Now you find me the other 50% on that pie chart and picture the miserable world you're advocating for. Then realise no logical developing country is going to comply with that plan as that means freezing them at their current level and that this isn't a fixable problem through reductions .. And chasing several thousand high emissions worth individuals is an utter waste of time .. Let's just agree to disagree I suppose.

[-] jesus_talks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If you already knew the answer why did you ask?

[-] Francisco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Did I knew the source that supported the comment of /u/malaph, no, I didn't. I don't have premonition abilities.

Are you okay?

[-] malaph@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

I mean.. they're making things for us generally. I don't think they're emitting recreationally. Look at a pie chart of total emissions and figure what you could cut to hit 50%. Do away with all transportation.. Boats planes etc and you're not even close.

[-] Yonrak@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the average person cut out 100% of their carbon emissions for the rest on their life, they'd save, on average, the amount of CO2 that industry creates in ~1 second. Our personal emissions are but a drop in the ocean in the grand scheme. Change is best brought about by voting both metaphocally with our wallets and literally with our ballot papers.

[-] zloubida@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The industries produces CO2 to provide us goods and services. Car is one of them; not using a car, not only I don't produce gazes directly (or less), but I also don't use something “the industry” produced CO2 for.

[-] malaph@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Why is industry creating carbon? They're building the things we need and generating our power. Probably 100% of industrial CO2 emissions are conducted for us. This is just our emissions upstream from the things we consume directly.

Also if you cut 100% of your emissions you'd be dead. Breathing emits CO2.

[-] Fjaeger@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

But now you can ride around on your high horse and look at all the scum ruining our planet with their cars.

We are never gonna have a chance against climate change if we try to plead to the individual to live a "greener" life.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Well, we are also never gonna have a chance against climate change if the individual didn't help.

Both need to put in effort.

[-] br3d@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Which companies are those? Coca Cola, who make your drinks that you drink? Ford, who make the car you drive? One of the oil companies who fuels your car? A company that makes the clothes you wear?

It all comes down to consumers in the end - we are the end point of the chain and these mythical 100 companies exist for us. Stop ducking the issue.

[-] Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

You're both right. We need massive systemic change, but that's not an excuse to not do what you can in your own life. It's really easy to get disillusioned (hell, I am half the time) but defeatism gets us nowhere.

[-] SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net 2 points 1 year ago

sort of, but also not. Sure, those companies are funded by us, but they lobby governments and shit so we NEED to buy their stuff. I wouldn't think GM would be such a big company if they didn't get rid of all the streetcars for example

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Now stop consuming animals.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
1390 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9561 readers
979 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS