1179
LibreOffice wee (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Now. Why am I wrong for Libre

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] misspelledusernme@piefed.social 6 points 21 hours ago

You can edit PDFs on libre?

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 18 points 21 hours ago

You can in libreoffice draw for sure.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago

Yeah but it's pretty limited and personally I could never get it to work, it couldn't handle larger files. Had to pirate some other program to do anything serious.

[-] gustofwind@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Are there any good free pdf editors anyway? I’ve always had to use a premium product in the end 😔

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago

LibreOffice Draw is the best in my experience. I edit a lot of pdfs for work and was tired of using an online solution which gave you two free document edits per hour. This was often enough but sometimes it wasn't, and that was annoying. So I tried four or five different offline software solutions for it, and I settled on LibreOffice Draw.

[-] gustofwind@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yeah, similar experience, I’ve also settled on draw. Works fine enough 🤷‍♀️

Sometimes I use my organization’s ms and adobe products and I just get a little ui envy…

Edit(sometimes I have to)

[-] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 20 hours ago

i mean, pdf's shouldn't be edited. that's the point of pdfs.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 8 points 20 hours ago

If pdfs weren't supposed to be edited, they shouldn't have mistakes that require editing.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 18 hours ago

this is why everything should be in plain text until it has been finalized

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago

I'm sure they thought it was finalized when they put it out.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 13 hours ago
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago

Why, when it takes like a second to just fix it and I don't even know who made it?

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 4 hours ago

because pdfs aren't made to be edited and any edit can fuck up the file permanently

[-] gustofwind@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago
[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 20 hours ago

i really wish i could.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 20 hours ago

editable pdfs would like a word

[-] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 18 hours ago

non-standard extension. should die in a fire.

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

That word is "bloat".

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

It's a file on my computer, I'll do with it whatever I want.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 18 hours ago

then convert it to a proper format until you're ready. editing a pdf is like decompiling and editing an exe file.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

What program do you use to convert PDFs, what format do you convert them into for editing?

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 13 hours ago

pdf is a compiled format for typeset text, so you need a pdf compiler. i use latex + tectonic. pandoc is also a popular alternative. "converting for editing" is like decompiling a program, you're not guaranteed to get the same thing back as was put in. i never do that, i recompile instead. if i need text from a pdf i use pdftotext and cross my fingers because the formatting ain't coming back out. any program that does replicate formatting just does a best guess.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm not sure if I'm following you - a compiler can be used to edit an existing PDF?

[-] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 12 hours ago

no, you can't edit an existing pdf, the nonstandard form filling extension notwithstanding. you can extract as much information as possible from it and recreate it. that's what "pdf editors" are doing. and since it's not officially supported, any edit can screw the file up.

the reason you can't just edit it is that pdf is basically a container for program code that runs on printers. so you can have text interspersed with formatting information, or text with non-existent characters approximated by vector images, or text that's been rendered to a raster image and is not actually in the document. then you have the fact that pdf can embed specialized fonts, compressed files, security measures, and even internal programs. and it's all offset-based in there so you need to modify the entire file structure in order to get it working again after adding text. what's worse, since any file with a pdf document in it is a valid pdf document according to the spec, less reputable "pdf editors" can just embed whatever shit they want. it's a common malware vector.

it's much safer to re-build the document from source. if you don't have the source, there are tools to extract just the textual content.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Ok, this definitely helps in understanding how PDF works. However, I really do edit PDFs regularly and have no problems with the edited ones. Already mentioned it ITT, PDF-Xchange lets me do so many things that listing them would sound like an advertisement. Editing the existing text tends to mess it up, that's true, but it's not crucial for me and all sorts of other actions work almost perfectly.

You're imagining some very ideal circumstances for working with PDFs that have nothing to do with my own needs, so I can't really make use of your advice. :/

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 4 hours ago

in what circumstance does pdf editing come up regularly?

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

I frequently download book and journal article PDFs, scan books myself, and upload them online. And ofc read them.

Editing the PDFs in my case includes e.g. adding the outline/bookmarks that allow for easier navigation, adding OCR, cropping, splitting and rearranging the pages when the scanned images aren't ideal, removing watermarks...

[-] WrittenInRed@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 20 hours ago

Inkscape can also kinda work depending on the PDF? I think libreoffice tends to be better still because inkscape treats text from an imported PDF weirdly iirc

[-] feannag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

It doesn't have every tool but I've been self hosting Stirling PDF and it suits most of my needs.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 20 hours ago

I've yet to find one. Pdf24 is free but not Foss and decent for certain tasks, but it's not a great editor. After using the paid version of xchange for as long as I have, using free options just leaves me disappointed.

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

What's kind of weird is that there seems to be no other program coming close to Xchange's range. I've tried a bunch of them and they're basically toys compared to it. There evidently is some demand, but just one company meeting it fully? Is editing PDFs particularly technically difficult?

[-] bufalo1973@piefed.social 2 points 12 hours ago

Try to open a text PDF with LibreOffice and you might see why is so difficult to work with them. You can find that all the text is spread in one field for each line, not a unique text box.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago

And the one company won't release a Linux version either. Sure, Wine exists, but it's not nearly as good as native support.

No clue how complicated PDFs, with all of its different versions are. Especially if some software make PDFs that don't even comply with official spec (not sure how often happens though).

[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

PDF Xchange Editor is cool. Thanks to it I haven't had a need for Adobe software on my PC in years.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
1179 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

8553 readers
2684 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS