232

The American dream feels impossible for many young voters, who see no political fix (www.npr.org)

submitted 1 week ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In communities of all kinds, voters in their 20s and 30s are confronting a financial reality of rising costs, mounting debt and minimal wage growth. But how is this changing their political views?

It's a question that NPR put to readers. We received more than 1,100 submissions from across the political spectrum from almost every state in the U.S.

Many described a similar reality — one where economic worries loom large over their everyday lives and erode their faith in the ability of those in power. Taken together, their responses paint a portrait of a generation of voters discouraged by what they see in Washington and who increasingly feel as if they have no political home.

It is important to note that the responses are not from a representative sample of all young voters. But what readers shared helps highlight a steep challenge facing Democrats and Republicans alike as they work to win over these voters, who are collectively expected to make up more than half the electorate in 2028. Here is a snapshot of what readers shared.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20251031121338/https://www.npr.org/2025/10/31/nx-s1-5590153/young-voters-american-dream-economy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 32 points 1 week ago

And it’s funny how the answer seems to be turning to the right wing. Concept that makes absolutely no sense

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

Becuase the so called "Left" Democrats aren't offering any real alternatives of lasting change. Only the Right are doing that

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

But the rights offer is practically openly 'We want to make everything worse for everybody' shouted with extreme enthusiasm for some reason.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

No, they're saying that things will get better if we get all our anger out on these specific people.

Of course it won't fix anything, but people are gullible

[-] __ghost__@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I grew up in a very conservative area. The people in my demographic only want to see change. The right wing government under Trump has been robbing the future blind with zero regard for anyone, but the sentiment I keep hearing is a perception that something is happening. "He's deporting the criminals," "he's saving our jobs," "he's making other countries pay us," "he's making America safe," ergo the idea that progression in any direction is progress. People are stupid and short sighted when they are struggling. So the adoption of populism makes a lot of sense to me

Another anecdote, there was a guy I used to work with that would say "we have to go all the way right to come back to center" and they actually believe that would happen lol

Anyway I hate this shit so much, have a good day

[-] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

I also live in a very conservative area with no hopes of moving any time soon. Your comment is spot on, they think he's actually trying to help when he is literally doing the opposite. However, it does appear that grocery prices going way up at the same time he's building a ballroom has kinda broken through to them a little bit. I'm sure they'll forget it in a week though like always :/

[-] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I’ve seen this theorised as being one of the key reasons that Harris lost. Obama campaigned on “change” and won. So did Trump. So did Biden. And Harris’ pitch was kind of “I’m going to keep doing what Biden was!”

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Any political novice could see there was no right answer there.

You can't promise change when you yourself served in the government 4 straight years as VP. They'd question why you didn't do any of this stuff already

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

It actually makes a ton of sense and has oodles and gobs of historical precedent. Fascism is what happens during capitalist crisis. When you weaken education, revoke social safety nets, delay retirement age, encourage unaffordable housing, withhold wages, withold healthcare, and promote wealth inequality, you're going to get fascists. The emerging fascist wing is anything but irrational. They are reacting to real issues, and so they flock to the only people who appear to actually get anything done: the right.

At the moment that the “normal” police and military resources of the bourgeois dictatorship, together with their parliamentary screens, no longer suffice to hold society in a state of equilibrium – the turn of the fascist regime arrives. Through the fascist agency, capitalism sets in motion the masses of the crazed petty bourgeoisie and the bands of declassed and demoralized lumpenproletariat – all the countless human beings whom finance capital itself has brought to desperation and frenzy.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism.

Now who says the parasites have to be biological?

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025

232 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26291 readers

1875 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News