Ah, nevermind then. It seems we have complete disagreement.

'revenge' is valued through the nature of the act. If you know that wronging someone is to have consequences, that acts as a deterrant. But more importantly, it artificially imposes a moral imperitive. You wrong someone, you must be for your misdeed. To allow the victim to participate in the act is as best meaningless, their satisfaction is not why justice is being dealt. At worst, it justifies their darker impulses and could corrupt otherwise good people.

Yeah, "evil" is anyone i disagree with. I have achieved my views through discussion with many people from many walks of life, and through witnessing societal interaction, and by self analyzing intensely. I am fully prepared to defend my views as just and correct, as well as give logical reasoning behind why my views are correct. If my views were deemed to be incorrect, i wouldnt have them. In other words, if you dont want to be deemed evil, stop making objectively bad decisions.

Yep, removing is what you do to things you cant fix. We probably could fix these people, open up their brains and physically reprogram them to remove things like racism, sexism, and othering. But people seem unwilling to actually fix the problem, so more dramatic steps must be taken in the short term until we have a more stable society that is able and willing to engage in progressivism.

If youre just murdering everyone who you don't like, I think that's bad I see where youre coming from, but you have to understand that the people I dont like a nazis, rapists, and facsists. If it wasnt justified to to murder them, they wouldnt be on that list.

And again, its not that I want to murder anyone, and im certainly not planning to do so unless someone attempts to infringe upon my rights as an American citizen or rights as a human being. But someone needs to remove these people because fixing them has proven to not be a viable strategy.