1136

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it's "her decision to make," she is a "very, very good politician."

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been "out on the streets with her" and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. "It's so incredibly genuine and open."

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

As a fucked up two-party system, the US cant really have female presidents. The candidate needs to round up new voters while retaining the old voters. A female candidate is sure to lose a lot of votes, just because she's female and way too many idiots are uncomfortable with a woman in charge of something.

While I'd love to see AOC as president, I think the democrats badly need to find a male to take the role as candidate.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Id love to see a female president. Based but downvoted. I love lemmy but this place is too progressive to hear basic truth.

To the people downvoting, consider the average voter and then realise.

❤️

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

when it happens will you be surprised or say you've supported them all along?

:|

this is america. if we elected trump's incompetence twice - I think the country is brave enough for the right person.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

I supported kamala all along and she lost so I guess we are both a bit

:|

I would argue that the US is not brave enough for the right person after voting for trump twice, I'd argue something else - perhaps too retarded for the right person? I say this with a really fucking heavy heart.

[-] delta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

What made you support her all along? Just because not-Trump or is there more to it? I’m curious because the last thing I wanted was Trump back in the WH. But at about a week into her campaign, I knew it was going to be a disaster. Her refusal to separate herself from Biden to give him some kind of “respectful send off”, and her refusal to denounce the war in Gaza, also likely forced on her by the establishment. Whether or not she actually would have, who knows. But politically, it was so clearly the right move to make. This was at a point in time where a majority of voters were against the war, and the vast majority of democrats. It would have been so easy. One phone call and the war is over. Always been that way. Now here’s Trump getting all the credit.

AND THEN she gets on stage at the DNC and starts screaming about how we need to build the most lethal fucking military in the history of mankind or some fucking crazy shit like that… GOD it was so painful to watch her make the wrong move every single step of the way.

By the time the election came around, I did vote for Kamala as I live in a swing state. But damn did I not feel good about it. It felt like compromising on my morals and values in the name of damage control instead of sending a message like “hey, you guys fucked up bad, you seemingly did not even attempt to earn my vote beyond “Orange Man Bad” and you’re going to have to make some SERIOUS changes next time around”

Instead, the election was pretty close. Knowing establishment dems, they probably see that as success in a way. Like, “okay, so we did mostly good but need to make a few more tweaks in order to get that last 1-2%!”

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

I supported her for her policies.

And yeah, that whole "not-trump" thing was enticing.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

This person definitely claimed after the fact that they never doubted Obama and it was obvious the country was not just ok electing a black guy, but enthusiastic about it.

Obama didn't just eek out a victory, he knocked it out of the park. None of their theories about the unstoppable power of prejudice account for all those bigots just taking 8 years off.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

what being aligned a good platform - jfc, how hard is it, basic human rights - to a charismatic leader - can do. they need to recapture that shit or we're all fucked

[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

The first woman president will be republican.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
1136 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26201 readers
2121 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS