378
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago

I am all for working from home but i think its disingenuous for these articles to not include which jobs and industries it applies to.
I can do my job entirely remotely but there are clear times when in person collaboration with office colleagues and tradies benefits both my work and theirs. (Professional construction industry)

I think some industries are definately benefit from on site/office work, and some people/personality types that thrive in person or benefit from the mental health benefits of social interaction when they might otherwise not have any.

I love these results, i just think there needs to be more nuance in the reporting.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The best setups match tasks, roles, and personalities. Hybrid patterns serve hands-on work or intense collaboration weeks, while full-time home setups suit deep, individual projects. The point is fit: policy should respect job realities and human needs, because alignment prevents friction and protects momentum.

this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
378 points (100.0% liked)

Science

5480 readers
62 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS