599
Fun Facts (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

It's not semantics to be against incorrectly used, inclusive language when it includes two groups that couldnt have less to do with each other.

It's like saying "humans sexually assault dogs." And being mad when someone points out that humans dont generally do that, just creepy zoophiles.

Correcting language is the first step to correcting ideas, and thats the first step to fixing undeveloped countries like the us.

[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That is semantics friend. You're describing semantics. We disagree on the meaning of a word, because colloquially it means one thing while it means something else in other definitions.

Also your analogy is bad. You're describing a generalization or the formation of a stereotype.

Correcting language IS NOT how you correct ideas. You correct ideas by making people experience a difference in emotion.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago
[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Care to expand? Maybe read Rules For Radicals and you can tell me why I'm wrong.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

American usage/understanding of "liberal" as leftist in any meaningful way is not colloquial, it is a misapprehension deliberately encouraged by our government to give the false impression of political diversity

[-] zoloftt@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

As I said before, semantics. I'm on your side. I agree that the Dems are hardly any better than the GOP. The 2 party system is trash, and we need actual progress instead of folks just keeping things the way they are.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
599 points (100.0% liked)

Political Weirdos

1157 readers
56 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS