441
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) by zloubida@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

It's under a paywall for some, so here's the archived version.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

A lot of people pretend so as not to seem rude. Also you never know how the other person will react otherwise.

I know you find enjoyment in it, I'm just saying that planes and such places where people are stuck with you are pretty risky.

[-] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

And I will respectfully point out that you seem to be arguing entirely from vibes and anecdotes.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

You agreed that you never know how the situation goes. And I'm guessing we agree that people are stuck in planes. So why risk it, if you're going to potentially be making the situation suck for the other person, I'm wondering

[-] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

why risk it?

Because there’s almost no risk involved.

So why risk it, if you're going to potentially be making the situation suck for the other person, I'm wondering

Answers to this question, and more, are provided in some of the links provided.

The chances of making “the situation suck” are exceedingly small. The chances it “goes well” are quite high. A couple friendly words between strangers. A story to tell later.

Of particular note

His curiosity led to a series of experimentsrevealing that train and bus commuters who interacted with other passengers experienced a more pleasant ride — even when they believed they would prefer the solitude of, say, reading a book.

It is fear that the person sitting next to us won't enjoy talking to us that makes us keep to ourselves, Epley found. But when we do talk to each other, those social interactions with strangers tend to be both less awkward and more enjoyable than most people predict.

You seem to completely discount this possibility, while simultaneously overblowing the risk.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It just seems a bit selfish to try and "connect" in a sotuation where they can't leave. I get that it is your thing but at least on a plane it would be bettee to just chill for the duration of it. After all nothing negative about that, they might try to connect with you if they're up for it

[-] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

There may be a selfish component to it. Doesn’t make it a selfish act.

I get that it’s your thing

It’s my thing after I read a few of these papers (you can find the links, and read them if you like, they’re in my other comments) and started giving it a shot.

it would be bettee to just chill for the duration of it.

Yes, you have made it very clear that for you, you believe that this is the case.

The data show that a lot of people feel this way before they try it, but are pleasantly surprised after.

After all nothing negative about that, they might try to connect with you if they're up for it

Nothing negative about what? “Being chill?” I think you’ll find that I’m pretty chill.

You seem to think I’m nagging them for the duration, but as I’ve explained, it’s really more of creating an opening.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

You won't cause anything negative by just chilling during the flight. Meanwhile, by trying to connect, you might make someone's travel worse. So if you value the fellow passengers, best move is not to risk it, at least not on the plane. Otherwise you're just gambling with their mood, which seems a bit shitty.

[-] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

So if you value the fellow passengers, best move is not to risk it

There’s a lot of big assumptions built into how you think about risk if the only possible outcomes you can conceive of are negative.

at least not on the plane

Oh yes the plane. Because of the implication, right?

I just feel bad that your outlook is so sad for all of this.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Well you won't negatively affect them by not interacting with them. They are still free to talk to you, after all. The implication is a good one because they don't know what sort of creep or angry person you might be and how you would react to rejection. You're almost insisting on talking to the people on a situation you know might negatively affect them and where they are stuck in the situation and that just seems odd.

[-] jve@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I feel like you’re just reiterating your last comment as though you didn’t read mine.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
441 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

76180 readers
2160 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS