501
submitted 1 week ago by Comrade1917@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Those are libertarians, the"I got mine and fark everybody else" crowd, not liberals.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Communists are liberals, it’s funny seeing how many liberals in the fediverse use it as a slur. Even the anarchists look down on the anti-government people.

And yeah Libertarians are liberal as well, the problem is including everyone else that isn’t authoritarian.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago

In what manner are communists "liberals?" Why are communists capitalists in your eyes?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

See you don’t know what the term liberal means.

It has nothing to do with capitalism.

Communism doesn’t have a government, that makes them liberals.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Liberalism is an ideology supporting private property and individualism. Communism doesn't have a state, but it does have administration, which some consider government, and communism lacks private property.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Private property in the sense the government can't seize your home or car or rollerskates without due process. It is not the main caveat of liberalism, which is pro liberty, aka pro human rights. It is an ideology independent of economic system

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

No, this is entirely wrong and is completely unsupported by historical context.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

If you have an administration then you create a class struggle that will lead to oppression.

You have private property because the state (public) doesn’t own it, the people do. (That’s private since you seem confused)

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

No, administration isn't class, and ownership is collectivized rather than individual. This is very basic.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can the administration control what the commune does? Laws? Policing?

If so then given time the people who seek it will elevate that position.

Public ownership under communism doesn’t mean the government (or administration to use your term without a difference) owns it. It means the population has control over whether it is helping (keep) or hurting (remove) society. And the workers are at the forefront of that not politicians or owners.

You’re aware that liberalism views landowners as a scourge of society because they make money without adding anything to the world but you cannot view said viewpoint from a communist perspective.

I’ll give you another crazy idea; political parties/governments are corporations. They will put their own survival above that of the people they represent.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

None of this is correct, and further communism is not communalism.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, and all are equal, but some more equal. Particularly, anyone that was part of the administration of the soviet union was more equal than anyone not close to the administration.

Administration needs to be humanless.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Communism has never been about "equalitarianism." Communism is about suiting the needs of all with everyone's productive capacity, not trying to make sure everyone has the same thing. Over time things will trend towards more evenness, but fundamental characreristic differences in ability will still remain, differences in need, etc.

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Liberal is when no government...

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Yes but it’s a range. The more liberal, the less power government has until it doesn’t exist.

At least in the political sense of the word.

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You're in .ml my guy it's not possible to argue with these guys they are marx magas

[-] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Liberalism isn't a capitalist ideology

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Yes it is. It centers private property and invidividualism.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago

Why do you feel confident to speak on a subject you have clearly spent zero time informing yourself?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Taking political science courses in university and having many books is why I can call out people using liberal incorrectly.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

You might want a refund on that degree.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You are indeed incorrectly calling people out.

Maybe you can wipe your ass with those books for all the good they did you.

I took political science classes in college too. They taught the political compass. They lamented 'polarization.'

If you were too stupid as a child to see that you were being fed slop you can be forgiven. It's time to use your adult brain to reexamine those things.

[-] Edie@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Taking political science courses in university

Ah, that explains it

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ngl I don't blame anarchists. Public schools explicitly said "communism is when government doess stuff."

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
501 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

52947 readers
315 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS