1639
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Woland@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 years ago

To be fair, if I was a billionaire and I had the choice of helping ordinary people or doing something awesome, I would definitely pick to do something awesome. I respect Bill Gates for fighting malaria, but I would go for spaceships or robots.

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 85 points 2 years ago

Which is why not you, nor them should have so much money. We need to prevent idiots from doing idiot things by redistributing their wealth.

Helping ordinary people is the most awesome thing though.

[-] thrawn@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Gates has the money to do both, and more. It’s just sometimes better to let others do it instead— having your own space company means worrying about competition, contracts, and potential profitability. Meanwhile if he wanted, he could hitch a ride on any of their rockets with no effort.

Musk and Bezos also have the money to do both, but they merely elect not to. Perhaps in the future they will, like Gates, begin funneling more of their effort and wealth into altruism to improve their reputations.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

I'm an engineer, so my childhood fantasy wasn't to ride on a rocket, it was to invent a rocket. I did think it would be cool to explore space, but not as a test pilot or a tourist. To be honest, I don't think I'd go on one of those tourist flights even if it was free - I feel no urge to risk my life just to get a good view of Earth. Being a space colonist would be a different matter - then I'd get to actually use my skills to build stuff.

(The reason I think this is relevant is that a lot of these tech billionaires were originally engineers too, so I guess they also think like this.)

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

But if it's something awesome marketed towards saving humanity then do something actually awesome and impactful instead of distracting bullshit like hyperloops and Mars colonies on unrealistic time-frames and self-driving cars instead of public transportation. Endless talk and grand gestures when these people have the resources to really drive improvements/innovations in achievable realistic projects.

[-] Warfarin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago
[-] hellishharlot@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

By going into work sick so that I can reduce my workplace's carbon emissions for a few days

[-] Warfarin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago
[-] hellishharlot@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Lol it's not virtue signaling it's malicious compliance. My workplace has vacation and sick days pull from the same incredibly small pool. They're also very anti work from home. So since I've explained the problem and was told to just take vacation time when I'm sick, I decided to just not "be sick" and explain the problem when it comes up next

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1639 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

51765 readers
859 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS