2172
submitted 1 year ago by MobileTechGuy@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 108 points 1 year ago

I've kept chickens. They do not understand the family concept. Roosters will happily rape their siblings or their mothers, and hens will enforce a gruelling pecking order even if it means someone dies of hunger/beatings 😢

[-] toastus@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago

And that makes it okay for humans to abuse them in even more brutal ways?

Or what are you saying?

[-] kwking13@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

That one whooshed right over your head eh? He's saying that chickens families are not, in fact, the same as human families. They don't form a family unit with bonds above those of other chickens. It's mostly because they're chickens....and not humans and it was a dumb comparison for PETA to try and make.

Pointing out how chickens relate to other chickens does not mean it's an endorsement for cruelty...you stretched big time for that one.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

I really really want you to explain to me how in your head what I wrote made you think I didn't get this absolutely obvious thing that OP stated lol.

[-] kwking13@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Well, either you're really bad at expressing yourself through online comments...or you forgot to add a /s to the end of your comment. Certainly seems to me like you're still a bit confused.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

So, do you think that there are ethical and non abusive animal husbandry methods for raising livestick?

Do you think there are ethical ways to slaughter livestock?

You seem to be making this a false binary.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

I make this practically correct binary because in practice more than 90% of all livestock is kept in inhumane conditions.

The theoretical possibility of an ethical way to raise and slaughter livestock is irrelevant to my argument and in essence a straw man because I don't argue against a hypothetically well raised and humanely slaughtered livestock but against the fact that in reality livestock is mistreated, tortured and killed in horrible conditions in most of all cases.

If I go to the supermarket and buy meat I am all but guaranteed that the animal has suffered.

If you raise your own livestock out on open field and treat it right I don't have a problem with you. But you don't, do you?

And even if you just are a carnivore I don't have any problem with you, you can live your life how you see fit. I don't really care.

But if you go to the internet to shit on people that care about animals to feel better about the fact that you don't, I think you are a dick.
Not saying that applies to you specifically, but I have seen examples in this thread.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

I might be a dick. But you sir/madam/xir or whatever, are an asshole.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Possible.
The majority of people I know in person would disagree I hope.

I agree that I am pretty combative here, but I am also tired of the ever same old and disproven arguments. I am not even vegan myself, but ridiculing people for trying to save animals is just low imho so I kinda don't care if I am an asshole to people that do it.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
2172 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45680 readers
461 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS