153
Why lemmy.world should not defederate from beehaw.org.
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
153 points (100.0% liked)
Lemmy.World Announcements
29022 readers
8 users here now
This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.
Follow us for server news ๐
Outages ๐ฅ
https://status.lemmy.world
For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.
Support e-mail
Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.
Report contact
- DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport
- Email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported)
Donations ๐
If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.
If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us
Join the team
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
But surely we hope that this level of users is permanent? I think it'll be in place until lemmy has better moderation tools, which could be quite some time. It has the benefit that it is Open Source though so anyone can help.
the level of users is hopefully permanent, but the lack of moderation to adequately deal with it, both from beehaw and lemmy.world, is not
its also a cultural problem, at the moment the culture of the fediverse is still settling and folks are poking and prodding and seeing how much they can get away with
The problem is mainly that open registration allows quick ban evasion, making it very hard to remove bad actors that are using instances with open registration (without admin approval).
But admin approval just slows it down right? Like how is the admin going to know you aren't a bad actor?
It also really slows down the sign-up process which will cripple the growth of the Fediverse.
Yeah, it's a pity, this is the worst time for defederation, when the userbase is seeing a boom in growth.
Yeah, it seems some are happy to burn down the whole thing if it means they can rule over the ashes.
That's not what's happening at all. They have site rules. Remotr users aren't following them, and aren't beholden to them. Why should they continue to federated with instances that have incompatible rules?
That's not "burn[ing] the whole thing down". That's community management.
The other side of federation is that instances are communities in their own right. And you don't get to show up in someone else's yard, shit in their pool, and then expect to be invited back.
Not if they can't keep up with them. And if the trolls and bad actors are mostly coming from the same 2 or 3 places, why wouldn't you just block those 2 or 3 places?
You can step on each individual ant that walks through your door, or you can get better door seals.
No, they can't, that's the point. On their own instance, there's an approval process for new users, and so it's much harder and slower for a banned user to come back with a different account. On the two instances they defederated from, new user registration is instant and automatic, so if you ban one of those users, they can be back in seconds on another account.
It's their own prerogative, but considering their "restrictive" registration process with that application box, I'm not sure Beehaw will grow much in the future.
My guess is they're 100% fine with slow growth. Apparently they're looking for a specific kind of community, and they'd much rather have a small one of the right sort than a large one of the wrong sort.
It slows it down sufficiently that both sides can deal with it.
I don't think normal approval of accounts slows down the growth of the fediverse. No single instance alone can manage thousands of users signing up the same time anyways, so admin approval also helps balancing the load by making impatient people sign up somewhere else that is not overloaded with applications.
They are waiting for better moderation tools yeah :)